**Why we don't considered Ali to have a great CHIN?**

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Orishaman, Dec 21, 2007.


Page 3 of 3
  1. MotorCityCobra

    MotorCityCobra Member Full Member

    238
    2
    Nov 23, 2007
    Based on what? What recent list? I believe Ring itself had him at #44 or so. And I don't think Sugar(someone who rates Dempsey #9 P4P all time) should be taken seriously considering how amazingly biased he is for the old timers.
     
    MotorCityCobra, Dec 22, 2007
    MotorCityCobra, Dec 22, 2007
    #31
  2. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    42,072
    3,660
    Jun 30, 2005
    Sugar actually had him just a tad higher, at #88.

    Sugar actually had Tyson at #100, but in the late 80s, had Tyson at #27.
     
    Thread Stealer, Dec 22, 2007
    Thread Stealer, Dec 22, 2007
    #32
  3. Orishaman

    Orishaman I tell it like it is.... Full Member

    5,582
    0
    Aug 5, 2004
    On his book of his top 100 boxers ever Bert Sugar has RJJ like 96 or so...so did Herb Goldstein...I am a Ring Mag fan but sometimes, they go with the signs of the times and not the best boxers....when it come to ATG list....

    I clearly explain the reasons why I don;t beleive RJJ is Top 100 ATG material and I rather don;t go into it on this thread..if you want to ...you can find the thread and we can continuein there
     
    Orishaman, Dec 22, 2007
    Orishaman, Dec 22, 2007
    #33
  4. Orishaman

    Orishaman I tell it like it is.... Full Member

    5,582
    0
    Aug 5, 2004
    Yeap...88, that sounds correct..anyhow, it shows that other boxing authorities do agree with me
     
    Orishaman, Dec 22, 2007
    Orishaman, Dec 22, 2007
    #34
Page 3 of 3