Why were GGG fans so Angry at Sergio Martinez?

With you I can't ever be to sure if it is a typo or you're just being your typical self.

And that's another lie regarding Chavez Jr. You're getting rather pathetic.

 

Well I’m not as their is no race or nationality that I know of called MexiCANS, there is however a fighter that people follow and make excuses for that comes under that guise and that is JCC jr.....nice try though with the faux fury.

 

Yet you are the one following me around the forum trying to get one over me like a jilted girl.

 

What does nationality have to do with anything? Are you exposing your true colors?

Just in this thread alone you have made excuses for GGG for fighting Martirosyan, for allowing the IBF to strip him, for contradicting his stance on vacating titles to avoid mandatories.

You've rapidly descended to the lowest levels of idiocy. Accusing anyone of making excuses for a fighter when its you who has been justifying GGG's every move. Next thing you're going to say is that fighting Roles was a smart business decision, right? LMAO!

 

Quit playing we know what you are getting at

 

Wow, you are actually dumb. I'm post #3 in this thread, and in post #13 you are the one quoting me.

So let me get this straight.. Its your GGGoon double standard kicking in again. When I quote you I'm following you around, but when you quote me first, you are not following me around? Gotcha, you're a reetard.

 

That guy is a joke. It's sad that guys like iii and his GGGoon buddies egg him on despite looking like an imbecile.

 

I’ve not made any excuses of the sort.

Golovkin knee Derevyanchenko would be a tough asking and turned it down as he had the Canelo rematch, which would be a tough asking and a tough fight before another tough fight doesn’t make sense, especially when it’s a massive payday and it was your opponent who made the rematch fall through. Was Vanes a good fight? No and I’ve never claimed it was but it was a wise move considering the fight he had coming up. If it had been a mandatory with a full camp it would be a disgusting cherry pick although Vanes is arguably Lara’s best win, so....

If GGG truly wanted to avoid Derevyanchenko he would never have given him a full camp in preparation to face him like he did.

As for nationality grow a set and don’t jump on your fellow snowflakes wagon, you know what I was insinuating.

 

Julio Cesar Chavez jr being an utter bum???

 

Then say that man

Im not bashing on your opinion. But u brought nationality into it

 

Again I didn’t I used a phrase off a fighter, as an example I would never use that term for Morales, Chavez sr, Sanchez, true Mexican greats.

 

Dude, no matter which way you put it, its a ****ing excuse. Canelo had his excuse for postponing the GGG fight, and GGG had his for ducking his mandatory. Whether both and Canelo fought the opponents at a future time doesn't change the fact that they both had an excuse why not to do it at the precise moment it was demanded.

And you're still trying to up Vanes by saying it was Lara's best win.. LOL.. How about we mention that he had 5 weeks to prepare and had been retired for two years, and was coming up in weight. LMAO!! Disgusting right?

If you want to argue which EXCUSE is more valid, that's something different, and you're not going to win that argument either. So let me know.

GGG fought Derevyanchenko once he lost to Jacobs and looked very beatable against Culcay, and possibly to the risk because Canelo told him he would not fight him unless he stopped begging and found a title to put on the line, only then did GGG take the Derevyachenko fight. And I will bet you money that GGG's next opponent will not be elite. It will not be Andrade, Saunders, or any other elite or proven champ.

 

Golovkin fought Derevyanchenko for a vacant title with both of them having full training camps and he won more rounds against Golovkin than Canelo did over two fights.

Vanes is arguably Lara’s best win, this is fact but I agree it’s a poor opponent for Golovkin.

And in your words Canelo had his “excuses” for postponing the fight? Of course he did it’s called failing a PED test

Now did Canelo duck Golovkin by dropping his belt instead of facing him after the infamous “us Mexicans don’t **** about”?

 

So you're insinuating that Canelo didn't win at least 5 rounds in both fights? LMAO!!!! You couldn't care less about credibility can you?

It's a fact?? LMAO!! I guess you have never heard of these two fellows.. Come on man, don't waste my time with stupid **** like this.

Paul Williams, Austin Trout, > Vanes Martirosyan

Gawd you're ****ing dumb. He failed the test for the rematch dork.

He dropped the belt, and immediately challenged to Golovkin to a Non-title fight at 155. In other words, Canelo who had never fought above 155 called GGG's bluff that he would fight anyone between 154-168, and so that GGG wouldn't use the WBC MW title as an excuse to swerve Canelo clearly said, "lets do it for pride, not for titles".

So one fighter talks big and says. "I'll fight ANYONE between 154-168!!" and then another fighter who has never fought above 155 says, "I'll take you up on that challenge, let's meet at 155", and then the first fighters says, "No."

I think the only one ****ing around was GGG talking the talk but not walking the walk.

"I'll fight ANYONE between 154-168"

Andrade- fight me!
GGG- No

Trout- Fight me!
GGG- No

Lara- Fight me!
GGG- No

Ward- Fight me, 168!!
GGG- No

Canelo- Fight me, 155!
GGG- No

Brook 147- I'll fight you!
GGG- Ok, at 160 though.

That's the man you make all these excuses for LOL