Why were the old giants bad?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by cross_trainer, May 30, 2022.


  1. Pat M

    Pat M Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,605
    3,938
    Jun 20, 2017
    How would they determine an average height anyway? Don't they measure the players now? In past eras they did stories about exaggerated listed heights in the NBA. There would be no way to get an accurate measurement of 50s, 60s, 70s, etc. players to compare with the current group.

    Here is an article in which contemporary player, J.J. Redick says that the top NBA players of pre-1980 would not be competitive today. He says they were playing against "plumbers and firemen." According to the article, many in the NBA agree with Redick.
    https://thecomeback.com/espn/jj-redick-bob-cousy-plumbers-firemen.html
     
    cross_trainer likes this.
  2. Dubblechin

    Dubblechin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,446
    18,090
    Jun 25, 2014
    The U.S. population in the 1930s was 120+ million. Today, it's 330+ million. Only 14 percent of all men in the U.S. may be over six feet today, like there were then. But there are nearly three times as many men in that 14 percent category.
     
    choklab, thistle and cross_trainer like this.
  3. 70sFan865

    70sFan865 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,547
    9,549
    May 30, 2019
    Of course I have:

    https://runrepeat.com/height-evolution-in-the-nba

    This is the most basic analysis of this topic, but it doesn't include the fact that players were measured without the shoes before the early 1970s. Since then, players height got inflated by around 1-1.5 inch (which can be seen when you analyze draftcombine measurements). To see more straightforward analysis, you can start here:

    This content is protected


    This content is protected


    This content is protected

    That's a myth, Wilt faced centers that were on average as tall as centers today.
    Sure, but NBA didn't exist back then. That's my point, you can't compare NBA to boxing.
     
    Jackomano and cross_trainer like this.
  4. 70sFan865

    70sFan865 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,547
    9,549
    May 30, 2019
    No, they did it once two years ago but even then teams were inconsistent with it.
    Teams had a simple way to get height numbers back then - they took college numbers. That's why most players were listed inaccurately back then.

    Still, we have a lot of contemporary reports from preseason camps.
    Redick has become a meme recently, you shouldn't take this too seriously.

    Edit: I just looked at this article and these guys included here are not any experts or even "in the NBA". We're talking about Stephen A. Smith and his company, ultimate hot take artists.
     
    Last edited: Jun 1, 2022
    Jackomano likes this.
  5. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    25,260
    16,097
    Apr 3, 2012
    That’s not a valid source. “Dantheman” is pushing an agenda with his cherry picked data and hilarious photoshop that makes Wilt’s head look like he’s Andre the Giant.

    We both know that pro basketball existed before the NBA was officially formed that it’s irrelevant to use that as a cop out.
     
  6. JunlongXiFan

    JunlongXiFan 45-6 in Kirks Chmpionshp Boxing Predictions 2022 Full Member

    5,896
    6,292
    Aug 9, 2020
    There were pretty much much 0 big guys in 1900. Only 4% of men in the USA, for example, were above 6' in 1900. https://naldc.nal.usda.gov/download/IND43861419/PDF

    Nowadays 15% of all men and 20% of young men are equal or taller than 6 feet. Due to how standard deviations work (in height 1 SD is 2.5 inches), this means that a 6'6 person would be over 50x as rare in 1900 than 2020. 6'6 would be 4.5 standard deviations from the norm in 1900 and 3.5 in 2020. For IQ, 3.5 standard deviations is 152 (1 in 3,795) vs 4.5 standard deviations, 167 (1 in 251,000)

    When you consider how many more countries (are into boxing) and people in general there are now, it's no surprise at all.
     
    cross_trainer, choklab and NoNeck like this.
  7. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,672
    7,633
    Dec 31, 2009
    Yes you are correct. Three times as much of everything.

    without the advances in sports, the giants still wouldn’t get a look in. They would have three times as many old school elite heavyweights to get past.
     
  8. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    25,260
    16,097
    Apr 3, 2012
    Population exists on a bell curve, not just as a multiple.

    The bell curve shifted to the right, making the increase in big people disproportionate to the increase in the rest of the population.
     
    cross_trainer likes this.
  9. 70sFan865

    70sFan865 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,547
    9,549
    May 30, 2019
    He doesn't, he just posts data collected from articles from the 1960s. As far as I know, he never did what you accuse him of either.

    Even if you don't believe dantheman, you can use offical sources and 1960s NBA was only one inch shorter on average than 2020s NBA.

    What source do you have for "Wilt played against small guys"?
    You specifically mentioned NBA, if you want to talk about pre-NBA leagues then it's another matter.
     
    cross_trainer likes this.
  10. FrankinDallas

    FrankinDallas FRANKINAUSTIN

    28,440
    34,794
    Jul 24, 2004
    Redick is an idiot. Only an idiot would call Chamberlain, Oscar Robertson, Jerry West, Elgin Baylor, Bill Russell and John Havlicek plumbers.
     
  11. 70sFan865

    70sFan865 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,547
    9,549
    May 30, 2019
    I don't think he's an idiot, I think he does it on purpose.
     
  12. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    25,260
    16,097
    Apr 3, 2012
    These are the guys who Wilt scored 100 points against:
    Player Pos Min FGM FGA FTM FTA Reb Ast PF Pts
    Willie Naulls F 43 9 22 13 15 7 2 5 31
    Johnny Green F 21 3 7 0 0 7 1 5 6
    Darrall Imhoff C 20 3 7 1 1 6 0 6 7
    Richie Guerin G 46 13 29 13 17 8 6 5 39
    Al Butler G 32 4 13 0 0 7 3 1 8
    Cleveland Buckner 33 16 26 1 1 8 0 4 33
    Dave Budd 27 6 8 1 1 10 1 1 13
    Donnie Butcher 18 3 6 4 6 3 4 5

    Imhoff was 6’10, 220 making him a modern small forward who would get bullied by larger men like Lebron and Kevin Durant.

    Buckner was a size smaller at 6’9, 210.

    Everyone else on the Knicks was both shorted and lighter.

    The Sixers were playing two guards who were about 6’0 and 180 pounds.

    This doesn’t resemble modern pro basketball. I’ll go so far as to say that various Euro teams would smoke them.

    This is like pretending that Fred Fulton was the same size and Wlad Klitschko.
     
    cross_trainer likes this.
  13. 70sFan865

    70sFan865 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,547
    9,549
    May 30, 2019
    Imhoff was 6'10 without the shoes, which is the size of average center in the league right now. His 220 lbs is his college weight, he weighed more than that as a pro. There is no way that KD would bully Imhoff, have you ever seen him on the court?

    You picked this game only because Phil Jordon missed it and he was also 6'10 veteran. You also picked Knicks because they were relatively small team.

    Again, this is Knicks starting lineup in 1962 season (measured without the shoes with college weights):

    PG: 6'2 175 lbs Al Butler
    SG: 6'4 195 lbs Richie Guerin
    SF: 6'6 225 lbs Willie Naulls
    PF: 6'5 200 lbs Johnny Green
    C: 6'10 205 lbs Phil Jordon

    Average: 6'5.4 and 200 lbs

    This is 2022 Warriors starting lineup (measured with shoes with college weights):

    PG: 6'3 185 lbs Steph Curry
    SG: 6'6 200 lbs Klay Thompson
    SF: 6'7 200 lbs Andrew Wiggins
    PF: 6'6 230 lbs Draymond Green
    C: 6'9 220 lbs Kevon Looney

    Average: 6'6.2 and 207 lbs

    I see no difference basically.
     
  14. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    25,260
    16,097
    Apr 3, 2012
    So you cherry picked the smallest team in the nba, which is just a bunch of shooters by design?

    We can debate this further if you put your weird agenda aside.
     
  15. Bhoybuudy43

    Bhoybuudy43 Member Full Member

    115
    115
    Feb 22, 2022
    This thread is is developing into Monty Pythons ‘archaeology today’ sketch.