Me too, leaving all that stupid stuff aside I get in to on here, the back and forth rubbish, I believe I'm fair and honest but I do get a little carried away sometimes. Wilder is the American and therefore should get a large/larger slice of the US side of things, now the problem with that is.. Wilder doesn't earn a lot on that side of the pond right now and we don't know his deal with Haymon and the others so I believe that's where the problem will be. If Wilder has to pay Haymon, Finkle, DeBella then his purse will be quite small for a fight this size taking all that in to consideration. Personally I think there is some sort of deal with these people that isn't great for him and that stops him earning large amounts because 1.5-2 million a fight is very small for a US Heavyweight world champion. Also I believe Wilder wants a bigger slice of things UK side because he can't guarantee he will sell in the US but it's a sure thing AJ will sell it this side. And you're right, at this stage we are all guessing and double guessing. We don't know exact details.
That sure told me didn't it. I love debating with you and Galvatron. It's a real pleasure. It's like being in the company of 2 professors.
But if AJ gets chinned in his next fight, the Wilder fight is gone. If Wilder is chinned, then the money in fighting for that WBC belt is reduced. Likewise just a duck now will lead to 2019 being mandatory time. More possible losses because both are vulnerable. This is the moment to make it. If you duck it now then I predict that it never happens
Who had more views? AJ v Parker or Lara v Hurd? I don't even know Wilder's figures but I bet they're better than what AJ v Parker did....these ARE FACTS you imbecile.
He's going to be bringing more to the table than Parker and that I'd my main point. I'm not saying he deserves 30 million or anything like that but he deserves at least what Parker got.
I havent said anything about Joshua receiving any split in a rematch? Havent a clue what you are going on about there. did say if Wilder were to win he would be in the driving seat for a return. Think you have got the wrong poster because I havent spoken of any split for a return. Your're asking the wrong person
I understand, the rematch is included in the contract and that will be the primary point of contention. I think if it were simply a one fight deal at 25-30% that would be one thing, but the rematch is also included and Hearn wants the same split in the rematch, which would be assuming Wilder won. I believe this is a huge issue for Wilder and his team and is the more likely road block to the fight as it stands today. I meant nothing disrespectful with the previous post, and apologies if it came off that way.
I think that's fair...and I don't question AJ wanting the fight, no different than I never questioned Manny wanting the Floyd fight. I don't think Hearn wants the fight, just as I don't think Arum wanted the Mayweather fight, for possibly legitimate reasons.
Yes with 1 extra belt but that is all, that should not equate to Wilder being paid less than Parker who is the easier fight of the two.
One extra title thats all? Thats three in total! In that sense Wilder only has one title. Joshua still had to take and win that fight to get that title. We dont know if Parker is an easier fight than Wilder or not as I think it could be quite arguable that Parker has a greater resume than Wilder. If Wilder was blasted out in a round, would he have been the tougher fight? We really dont know Im surprised when I noted Joshua has yet another title since the Parker fight that you just say its one exra belt and thats all. Thats alot and more for Joshua to lose again
Wilder just beat Ortiz that trumps any win that Parker has and let's not kid ourselves that he's looked unbeatable since squeaking by Ruiz jr in a fight people had him losing. Wilder's resume isn't stacked by any means but he has 2 "top 10" wins in Ortiz and Stiverne, how many does Parker have?