Why would a fighter throw away the biggest PAY DAY of his career?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by HENDO, Jan 19, 2011.


  1. theboy_racer

    theboy_racer Boxing Junkie banned

    8,843
    5
    Mar 4, 2006
    Correct again.

    Wlad has definitely bished out of fighing Haye.

    Its not been argued yet by one of his fans.
     
  2. FORMIDABLE

    FORMIDABLE Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,664
    6
    Jan 12, 2010
    The Chisora fight had already been put together, it was just re-scheduled.

    Klitschko not wanting to drop everything and throw away months of inactivity and a good payday to wait on Haye again is understandable given their history.

    Wlad said he'd fight July 2, so really it only became a problem when Haye made it a problem.

    There is nothing stopping Haye getting his mandatory out of the way in March if keeping his phoney belt means that much to him. Not like he needs the rest. Fraudley didn't land a single punch on him.

    Haye being stripped should not stop the fight from happening anyway.

    If Haye was to beat Wlad he'd pick up Wlad's real titles, and the Ring lineal belt.

    He's basically giving up that opportunity to keep his fake belt, which he would lose anyway if Wlad was to win. Just doesn't make sense. He's giving it up in October just the same.

    If he was 100% committed to the Wlad fight he would not be so desperate to keep his fake belt.

    He must want that belt for something, and it ain't to pay more sanctioning fees.

    Best I can think of is to lure Holyfield into a fight.

    Who's to say he's intention is not to keep riding the Klitschko name by stringing Wlad along again and then to pull out and set up the Holyfield fight?

    Haye's a snake, he can't be trusted on anything he does or says.
     
  3. Jack

    Jack Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,560
    68
    Mar 11, 2006
    That's presumably the same reason that Haye was against a Chisora fight. If Wlad loses or he gets an injury, he's ****ed too. He would only have time in his career for one more fight, if a Wlad bout fell through. Considering Chisora would then have a rematch and a Vitali fight, if he continued winning, there may possibly be no Vitali fight either.

    It's just not worth it.

    If Haye wasn't going to fight, he could have stuck to his guns on the money issue or location. He deserves more than 50% and the fight makes more money in Britain, so if he'd been looking for a way out, there's two legitimate ones there. Why would he accept everything, get Sky and other TV companies involved to pull out again when he has the perfect opportunity there?

    It makes no sense.

    But yeah, the same problem you think Wlad has, Haye has too, I'm sure.
     
  4. rayrobinson

    rayrobinson Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,656
    711
    Dec 8, 2009
    No unification no fight , it makes sense.
     
  5. FORMIDABLE

    FORMIDABLE Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,664
    6
    Jan 12, 2010
    Haye said they'd agreed to all terms. It would only make sense if the contract stipulated the fight would be off should any of them be stripped.
     
  6. rayrobinson

    rayrobinson Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,656
    711
    Dec 8, 2009
    There is a small chance Wlad loses to Chisora , meaning a fight Haye signed today for a unification with Wlad wouldnt happen as Chisora would be the belt holder.
     
  7. stocks

    stocks Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,558
    0
    Aug 19, 2010
    This was a simple Duck!

    Haye agreed all terms and bowed to every demand Wlad made!

    Wlad chooses to fight a 14 fight no amature career nobody over Haye?!?!?!

    So 3 million or 20 million ummmmm think i want 3 milliom i dont like the look of the 20 it scares me!

    Any one who says Haye ducked if a prize one idiot!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Delete your account because you have no idea what your talking about! And before you say haye backed out the july 2nd date search these threads to find out why because i think i have explained it 20 times as well as alot of other guys just some people are ****ing stupid and understand!

    Haye WILL fight this year against Vitali! Not his ****** brother who is after an easy payday! And dont give me this bull**** about Wlad has to take the delboy fight or he had already agreed the fight its all bull****!! And this tune up **** is all bull**** as well!! Why cant he wait 7 weeks for 15 million????? No brainer if you ask me! Haye laid down this rule and Wlad used it to back out the fight!
     
  8. FORMIDABLE

    FORMIDABLE Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,664
    6
    Jan 12, 2010
    Cmon man, Chisora win? Saying that you are making him a credible opponent.

    Title or no title, if the fight is signed, it goes ahead.

    Wlad and Haye don't need belts to sell.

    You can see how much value American fans place on fighters having belts in the Alexander-Bradley unification bout, which has drawn very little interest. And they're American fighters.

    Haye-Wlad target audience is in the UK and Europe, and pretty much set.
     
  9. stocks

    stocks Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,558
    0
    Aug 19, 2010
    No way im paying to watch this rubbish! I see in a recent interview delboy has found loads of weaknesses with wlad :lol: He wont last 3 rounds and even less if he try to work the inside! IF delboy had the power to make wlad think twice then it may last 8 rounds
     
  10. Antsu

    Antsu Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,152
    383
    Mar 5, 2006
    Expect of course, Haye would be stripped by WBA, because of Wlads decision to fight Chisora.
    Haye can’t sing guaranteed unification match, to delay his mandatory, when Waldo is defending his title before unification.

    Why Wlad didn’t stay with original plan, to have Chisora in undercard as replacement, in case Haye pulls out?
     
  11. HEADBANGER

    HEADBANGER TEAM ELITE GENERAL Full Member

    13,664
    714
    Oct 17, 2009

    so what if vlad gets a bad cut from a head clash or some injury, what happens then with the fight being 9 weeks away?

    what if vlad gets put on ***** street by chisora and is crawling around on his hands and knees for 2 rounds solid because he is petrified of being hit in a boxing match? :lol:
     
  12. rayrobinson

    rayrobinson Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,656
    711
    Dec 8, 2009
    I agree Chisora isnt a credible opponent, so why should Wlad let a 14 fight novice opponent whome he probably knocks out in 3 stop him fighting a unification bout against a man he will make much more money against.

    From an outsiders point of view for Wlad to let this one fight dictate the superfight which is on the horizon tells me that he is either stupid (which he isnt ) or that he for what ever reason doesnt want the Haye fight.
     
  13. CoDer

    CoDer Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,914
    0
    Nov 14, 2010
    What kind of thread is this?

    It was Haye who backed-out.
     
  14. FORMIDABLE

    FORMIDABLE Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,664
    6
    Jan 12, 2010
    He's doing what Haye did against Harrison by taking this fight. It's about an easy payday. The TV date was there, the fight with Chisora was signed. Haye turned down April 30 and he obviously doesn't trust Haye enough to give that up and take him at his word it will happen July 2. In saying that he said he will fight July 2. Haye is the one saying he won't because of his fake title mandatory.
     
  15. rayrobinson

    rayrobinson Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,656
    711
    Dec 8, 2009
    Hasnt Wlad had enough easy paydays??

    Look at all the big fights we have had and how they are promoted.

    Im not saying that either fighter is right , wrong.

    But a superfight as this is meant to be doesnt need a cheap defence in the middle of it.

    Take for instance Mayweather vs Hatton they did London , Manchester , Newyork and LA , 24/7 this all generated PPV's.

    Chisora doesnt make sense and never will.....