Why would any Brits want Earl or Thaxton to beat Khan

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by robpalmer135, Nov 21, 2007.


  1. timber

    timber Active Member Full Member

    755
    0
    Dec 12, 2005
    Its not the end of the world if khan's chin is a bit weak. As long as he learns to tighten up his defence he's got the tools to be succesful.Look at David Haye for example many of us on here (and other forums) dissmissed him especially after that Carl Thompson fight but the lad is an undisputed champion now even with his 'questionable chin'. Over the years there have been many great champions with questionable whiskers but still made quite an impact .
    He also is still a growing boy and not fulfilled his body frame.Once he finds his optimum weight his punch resistance could improve (a la Cotto), same goes for Haye.
    I think he'll do ok ,wont set the world on fire but at least another Brititish world champ........cant be all bad can it?
    :hat
     
  2. achillesthegreat

    achillesthegreat FORTUNE FAVOURS THE BRAVE Full Member

    37,070
    28
    Jul 21, 2004
    Boxing fans can sometimes be the worst. The best get hated.

    The only thing you can do prior to pros is amateur and Khan set himself up much better than he did. His amateur work is sensational.

    Khan has height, reach and speed. He keeps showing better strength and power that people believe. He keeps showing better ring savvy i.e. footwork, pacing himself, fighting on the inside etc We can only go off what we know.

    His chin is suspect as is his defence but he is working hard on it. Nothing more can be asked.

    I think he needs to be treated like a star but by that I mean quality coach, quality sparring etc He has got Moore and M'Baye so they should be giving him amazing work.

    I wish him alot of success. No reason not to.
     
  3. brown bomber

    brown bomber 2010 Poster of the Year Full Member

    30,856
    17
    Jul 1, 2006
    Khans resume after 13 fights is better then Mayweathers at the same time.
     
  4. robpalmer135

    robpalmer135 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,342
    0
    Jun 29, 2007
    Certainly better than Hatton, Calzaghe and all other Brit champs apart from Haye.

    Infact he has faced tougher competition than Macceranelli has! Khan would beat Bobby Gunn!

    Sugar Ray Robinson fought bums for 6 years, Ali fought nobodys for a long time, Lewis and Tyson the same.
     
  5. elle

    elle Journeywoman Full Member

    3,655
    2
    Aug 21, 2007

    An interesting comparison.

    Here is another - Khan is about to go into his 15th pro fight, didn't Mayweather win a WBC Title in his 18th fight just turned 21 years old?
     
  6. robpalmer135

    robpalmer135 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,342
    0
    Jun 29, 2007
    1) Floyd won it in his 19th fight
    2) Khan is about to have his 14th fight
    3) Floyd only fought a former world title challenger in his 18th fight, Khan is doing so in his 14th.
    4) Floyd never a fought somebody with one defeat before becoming a world champion, Khan fought Limmond.
    5) Floyd was 21 when he won a world title, so Khan has a year to win won.
    6) Nobody critisised any of Floyd opponents on the way to a world title as they new he was a young contedner, they do for Khan for some reason.
     
  7. toffeejack

    toffeejack Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,064
    1
    Apr 30, 2007
    I don't like Khan.

    Apart from the media going completely overboard over him (which I understand is not his fault), he comes across as an arrogant, disrespectful ***** who believes his own hype.

    If, however he manages to dimsmantle Earl and Thaxton in impressive fashion I will give him credit because he will certainly deserve it. I don't believe he will ever reach World Class though.
     
  8. UndisputedUK

    UndisputedUK Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,152
    1
    Feb 20, 2006
    He lost in the final, and got the best of treatment. More money than some world champs make in their careers.
    He is not world class at the moment and has been fed light hitters. The boxing fans are not fooled.
    I'd like to see Earl win, some payback for him for the Katsidis fight.
     
  9. robpalmer135

    robpalmer135 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,342
    0
    Jun 29, 2007
    name a succesful boxer that is not arrogant? there is a difference between arrogance and confidence!
     
  10. achillesthegreat

    achillesthegreat FORTUNE FAVOURS THE BRAVE Full Member

    37,070
    28
    Jul 21, 2004
    In hindsight you can say Floyd stepped up but who is to say Khan won't be fighting Diaz in his 18th fight?

    You just don't know.

    For the time being Khans record is VERY good.

    If it is to be scrutinised, the fact he hasn't faced a puncher is suspect. However Earl has good pop and is a brawler so its a step up in power and overall class.
     
  11. toffeejack

    toffeejack Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,064
    1
    Apr 30, 2007
    There are many. Like you said there is a difference between arrogance and confidence and Khan is on the "arrogant" level.

    He's also very disrespectful to other fighters which I don't like and there are many great boxers who always showed respect to the opponent no matter what.
     
  12. robpalmer135

    robpalmer135 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,342
    0
    Jun 29, 2007
    He has only been disreqpectful to guys like Mitchell, Murray, Thaxton, and Earl becasue they have been disrespectful towards him. They are all jelous of him!
     
  13. toffeejack

    toffeejack Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,064
    1
    Apr 30, 2007
    Thats nonsense. Khan was the one running his mouth off at all the above mentioned before they all called him out.

    Like I said, he believes his own hype which is never a good thing. It's a matter of time before he gets sparked out, we all saw what happened when light-hitter Limond almost stopped him. Credit to him for coming back in that fight but all the ones you mentioned would have finished the job in the same position.
     
  14. elle

    elle Journeywoman Full Member

    3,655
    2
    Aug 21, 2007

    1) The records say Floyd won the WBC Title in his 18th fight.

    2) Khan's 14th fight was against Lawton. He is about to have his 15th.

    3) If Floyd only fought a former world title challenger in his 18th fight that must have been for the WBC title he won. Khan may be fighting a former world title challenger in his 15th fight but that is only in defence of his Commonwealth title.

    4) Don't understand the point being made.

    5) Floyd was 21 when he won a WBC world title which I think he went on to defend in his next 5 fights so will be interesting to see if Khan can equal that in the next year.

    6) The posts in this and other Khan thread's explain why Khan is criticised whether that is justified or not.
     
  15. elle

    elle Journeywoman Full Member

    3,655
    2
    Aug 21, 2007

    I see your point - Mayweather's career is easier to analyse because its there for all to see whereas Khan's destiny is based mainly on his potential. Early promise doesn't always translate to lasting success. Time will tell.

    Given Warren's reputation for protecting his fighters its highly unlikely Khan would be fighting Diaz in his 18th fight though.

    Khan is such a high profile boxer (something he himself has embraced it has to be said) he is bound to be scrutinised and I agree the fact he has yet to face a known puncher is suspect. Just how suspect that is we may find out during the Earl fight.