Why Would Joe Fight Hopkins Again?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by socrates, Oct 22, 2008.


  1. socrates

    socrates THE ORIGINAL... Full Member

    7,559
    3
    Sep 30, 2008
    "he deserved to lose but won the fight"

    my two headed,bisexual,schizophrenic,5 legged turtle in a terrapin beauty pagent was less confused than you.
     
  2. socrates

    socrates THE ORIGINAL... Full Member

    7,559
    3
    Sep 30, 2008
    really?
     
  3. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    You suck at everything, dude. Make more threads so you can get owned in them. It's funny.
     
  4. Monstar

    Monstar The Future.. Full Member

    11,166
    0
    Oct 10, 2007
    why'd he fight half the bums he fought?
     
  5. socrates

    socrates THE ORIGINAL... Full Member

    7,559
    3
    Sep 30, 2008
    must you bring your autism onto this thread,you just got slapped silly on the other one


    p.s wipe yourself down sweetie your drooling it is very uncouth

    and please enlighten me as to where exactly i was owned, link please?
     
  6. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    ******crates, keep contributing nothing to this forum. Do you.
     
  7. socrates

    socrates THE ORIGINAL... Full Member

    7,559
    3
    Sep 30, 2008
    yes yes yes


    this is the last time i will dignify your degenerate ass with a response,your opinion like you means nothing to me,your insignificant..

    a fly that must be squatted now shooo along little fellow there is a village in need of an idiot.take the next left and go straight on

    and please enlighten me as to where exactly i was owned, link please again?
     
  8. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    Yeah, you do that. Owning you in boxing gets boring - but owning recreationally is no fun at all. Too easy.
     
  9. socrates

    socrates THE ORIGINAL... Full Member

    7,559
    3
    Sep 30, 2008
    you are correct.
     
  10. catasyou

    catasyou Lucian Bute Full Member

    38,466
    21
    Apr 7, 2008
    He won't fight him again,he might just lose.Plus Bernard ain't looking to fight him anyway
     
  11. pauliemayweathe

    pauliemayweathe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,995
    0
    Dec 27, 2007

    why would any rematch be made then??? he FAR from blew BHOP out...I dont blame calzaghe or his fans for not wanting one...why kill what he has accomplished by risking a loss...good logic
     
  12. BewareofDawg

    BewareofDawg P4P Champ Full Member

    27,677
    184
    Apr 8, 2006
    Because Hopkins said he would never lose to a white boy twice.
     
  13. pauliemayweathe

    pauliemayweathe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,995
    0
    Dec 27, 2007

    not so sure of that...he is cashing in on an old shell of his former self RJJ why take a risk and hurt his legacy
     
  14. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,408
    48,821
    Mar 21, 2007
    1 - Calzaghe and Hopkins are both pound for pound top five and capaigning at the same weight. This is reason enough on it's own.

    2 - They were seperated by a split decision some see as contriversial - i had it to Joe by one point.

    3 - Hopkins has just put in one of the best performances in recent ring history against a man many were accusing Calzaghe of ducking (not my position).


    So yeah, this one has legs.
     
  15. Marnoff

    Marnoff Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,227
    27
    Feb 14, 2006
    The first fight was a close split decision. That might be the reason he'd pursue a rematch?