Why would you call Kell Brook "slick" just to defend him fighting Golovkin

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Willie Maeket, Aug 6, 2016.


  1. BlizzyBlizz

    BlizzyBlizz Loyal Member Full Member

    31,293
    3,510
    Jun 25, 2013
    I always thought slick fighters were great offensive and defensive fighters who could stand right in front of you and make you miss and counter and moved in and out and all around the ring who could attack and make you miss at the drop of a dime. They use a jab, dance and just look smooth out there offensively or defensively.

    A lot of boxers look slick, but aren't slick. I wouldn't call Brook a slick fighter. But he does fight slick at times. He probably takes a lil too many punches for me to call him slick, but he can fight slick. I want to see if he can get slick on GG.
     
  2. BlizzyBlizz

    BlizzyBlizz Loyal Member Full Member

    31,293
    3,510
    Jun 25, 2013
    Your both right in a sense.
     
  3. CST80

    CST80 De Omnibus Dubitandum Staff Member

    245,502
    241,171
    Nov 23, 2013
    Well Willie what do you think now? Was he slick enough for you?
     
  4. drenlou

    drenlou VIP Member

    75,540
    40,061
    Jan 22, 2015
    Brook exposed GGG tonite, is all I know..