This is a Scoop Malinowski article from 2009 "You decide for yourself if this VERY connected source knows a lot about about Pacquiao vs. Floyd or is he off on a tangent? Keep in mind this source is directly connected to Team Mayweather (no I dont mean cheerleader Leonard Ellerbe). This content is protected : Who do you see winning Pacquiao vs. Floyd? This content is protected : Its not gonna happen. This content is protected : You dont think so? This content is protected : No. This content is protected : Why not? This content is protected : Its not a fight thats meant to be made. That fights just not meant to be made. This content is protected : Why not? Everyone wants to see it? This content is protected : A lot of people want to see it but theyre not gonna see it. This content is protected : Mayweather doesnt want it does he? This content is protected : Ah, that fight is not gonna be made. This content is protected : Youre saying it with a lot of certainty in your voice. This content is protected : Yes sir. Yes sir. If it was gonna be made it would be made by now. This content is protected : Who doesnt want to pull the trigger? (I know Mayweather is the chicken here, just want to try to get more from the source.) This content is protected : I just dont see it being made. This content is protected : You know something but wont say it. This content is protected : [Smiles]. This content is protected : Who would win, if it was made? Just for fun? This content is protected : Its not gonna be made. That fight is not gonna be made. This content is protected : I hear you, its not even worth wasting the energy on a fight that is fantasy. This content is protected : Its not gonna happen. No. No. Mayweather is looking to fight somebody else right now. He just doesnt want to risk losing that 0. You know who he wants to fight? Matthew Hatton. I can reveal, the source is actually Paul Williams trainer George Peterson. How do I know? Scoop posted the exact same interview, 4 months ago, word for word, claiming Peterson had just said it on the second negotiation................ You know, this is what I mean: 1: Source is nothing to do with Mayweather 2: Source gives no detail whatsoever on anything 3: Source doesn't criticise Mayweather or Pacquiao 4: Source is referring to first negotiation, but author has used it twice to refer to two different negotiations As I said - a lot of guys, just mischief make
What's more, I should add, I also questioned the authenticity of the interview with the site owner. Particularly "It’s not gonna happen. No. No. Mayweather is looking to fight somebody else right now. He just doesn’t want to risk losing that 0. You know who he wants to fight? Matthew Hatton.”" That just sounds like it was added by the author! And the site, took the second version of the article down within hours. You can only find it via google now.