Whyte v Rivas PPV Numbers

Oh got you, yes very good numbers. Good for him - would be a big shame if these drug allegations are true and it scuppers the great progress he's made.

 

Thanks for taking the time to send that - very informative. I know very little about how these processes work so info like that is very helpful.

 

Great numbers. The job Hearn has done with Whyte is possibly the most remarkable I have seen in my time watching boxing.

The fact that AJ always had a rematch in his mind helped Whyte not get thrown under the bus in terms of opponents I reckon. 10 fights since, 10 wins( only one 50/50 in which he was literally hanging on for dear life in with special ref IJL firmly in his corner) and now he is hitting these heights.

These type of numbers show that he can come back from this episode with no bother if he is sanctioned (which I even doubt will happen). Want him in with big 3 now, think he gets sparked by AJ again, one shotted by Wilder and schooled by fury, but I still wanna see it because you never know

 

Regards Sample B, I think it was Gareth A Davies on talkSPORT (99% sure it was him) who said that the results of Sample B could take up to a year!!! Sheeesh! I presume the legals on both sides contribute to this length of time?

 

Who says those numbers weren't beefed up with illegal means?

 

Aydamn bought 100 times with all his freelancing money.

 

Listening to Costello earlier it sounded like the testing of a B sample was basically a formality that needed to be conducted in the presence of Whyte and a representative of his choosing.

Reading into that, if there is a delay it will be on Whyte’s part.

 

Mad int it. Frank Warren was saying they have had the results in as little as 30 hours in the past but as you say it’s the legals.

 

This is what I understood too. Whyte just has to go along and witness it along with a representative. He’s not done this yet apparently. If I wanted to clear my name and knew it was wrong i’d be stood on their front in morning waiting for the testers to come into work.

 

Please stop pretending you know what's going on. Hearn knows the details of the case and literally said "I am not backing Whyte, it was a legal process" - there is no conflicting interpretation, that's what the man said. Now, if Hearn knew Whyte was completely innocent, he would be repetitively saying "I am backing Dillian 110% in this case." He hasn't said anything like that.

 

And you are wrong, so have fun being wrong.

 

Tonighttttt I'm a PPV starrrr

 

They never do give the details, it is completely confidential for legal reasons, and no transcript is permitted to be divulged publicly or to the press. Instead, a copy is sent to a selective list of stakeholders - I think I have described this in another post.

But clearly, many posters on here do not realise the thoroughness of an NADP hearing, and who is involved. It is not run by UKAD.