Whyte v Rivas PPV Numbers

Because Whyte is an entertaining fighter.

 

I am certainly not wrong. Hearn hasn't publicly backed Whyte or denied he's taken PED's. If you can find a quote that suggests otherwise, I'll admit being wrong but there are no quotes stating as much.

What I want to know is; why isn't Hearn publicly backing his man? He's one of the only men who know the details of the case and he's not publicly getting behind Dillian. Why?

 

Because Hearn is a promoter. He was not involved at all.

Whyte got the call from UKAD, got the hearing date... Hearn has only the information given to him by BBBoC and Whyte.

The details of the hearing are not divulged to anyone outside of the stakeholders of the hearing, and Hearn is not a stakeholder.

And if you can't tell, out ALL the interviews that Hearn is supporting Whyte, then god help you man. Seriously...

I hope you know that quotes, writing, text messages, talking, ain't the only form of communication on gods green earth.

Body language, smiling, hand movements, are all forms of communication, Hearn could not say much on this topic for legal reasons, this has be reiterated many times.

But he has said "Calm down, relax, you'll hear from Dillian, he has done nothing wrong, he is in the clear, he is good, don't even bring up Miller#'s name, he ain't in the same bracket, this ain't the same situation.

But you believe what you want to.

I am fully confident in my perception of what Hearn is saying, what he is thinking, is another matter.

 

I know you think it’s all ok, but everyone is talking about this. This has been incredibly embarrassing for the BBBoC with names such as Bob Arum and the current unified heavyweight champion of the world expressing their concerns about (Loma) fighting here. The whole boxing world has expressed an opinion on it. This is not going away. It stinks.

 

Whyte has a long, long, long road to restoring his image in the public eye. But I am confident he is clear. My spidey sense is accurate.

 

God help you when the truth comes out.

Easiest thing in the world is for Hearn to say Dillian hasn't taken PED's. He hasn't done that.

 

I think you are missing the point entirely. And your life would be enriched if you just took the time to understand how the world operates before you get angry at it.

BScene reported a finding in one of Whyte's UKAD samples, we have NO OTHER FRIGGIN SOURCES, except the godfather of truth Thomas Hauser.

Assuming it was for real, an adverse finding, an NADP hearing is held, and INDEPENDENT PANEL OF THE MOST SPECIALIST, EXPERT, SENIOR LAWYERS, MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS, SPORTS SCIENTISTS, DOPING EXPERTS BONANZA.

And they examined, the evidenced, called Whyte in for an emergency hearing, and cleared him to fight. Whyte and Hearn are not that bothered at all. It is entirely possible that this whole thing has been solved already.

UKAD report the findings, NADP examine the findings, BBBoC receive instructions from UKAD and the NADP on how to proceed. All dealt with.

All that has been divulged so far is press, and media articles.

 

Not a chance, mate. The silence is deafening from all parties. No tweets, no statements, no nothing. They have categorically been unable to state that Whyte did not fail a test.

What’s your opinion on the gloves situation?

 

Dillian Whyte is the Zodiac killer.

 

If a ban is imposed his purse should be withheld

 

So there was another video today interviewing an undercard fighter on the night, and I think he had an issue with his gloves, they were too tight, so the board gave him another pair.

But he doesn't know if that pair was Dillians or not, he just asked for another pair, and the board gave him one.

Honestly, I genuinely don't think there was any wrong doing or malice. It's glove selections man, Dillian would happily fight without gloves, on the street, you think he is the type of guy to get gloves laces with lead or cement?

Come on man, a **** up happened on the night whoever's fault that was, but it seems everyone want's to paint Whyte as the devil in his 27th fight.

 

"If" being the operative word.

 

No ....'BAN' the the operative word here

 

I'm not emotionally invested in this case, mate. I don't care all that much either way but it's obvious to anyone unbias that there's a case to answer for here.

My life is great btw, but thanks for the concern.

You are missing the point. Innocent people declare their innocence at every opportunity. Guilty people seek court injunctions, deflect questions and refuse to deny guilt.

You're setting yourself up for an almighty fall here man. The least you could do is keep an open mind.