So you admit you got no idea what you were talking, cause you didn't know their rules? That's good. But you continue to talk nonsenses after that. Whyte is one of the best WBC mandatory for the last 10 years or so. Also Whyte resume s**** both together on Fury and Wilder before they get their title chances, aka how they become mandatory. It's miles better compare to both of them. Also i won't repeat the same comment for million time, you can just use your eyes and see when i pasted Whyte PPV numbers, which are rock solid for no-title holder. He is probably bigger draw in UK than Fury is. Also Fury didn't destroy Wlad, it was Klitschko who had a terrible night. Fury barely throws few punches more per round. Most boring HW bout in a century. And let's not forget Fury run out of the rematch, was caught with PEDS and retired in a shame with all his b.c. excuses that only his deluded blinded fanboys still believe. And if we talk about fights, Fury clearly lost to McDermott, so trying to spin x or y of Whyte fans is next level delusional, when Fury clearly lost that fight and his zero should have been long gone.
Yeah sure, you can talk whatever you want talk, but i'm not buying it. This is just your 525258 alt in case, that you keep in handy. Also everyone with unbiased mind can see that Whyte is the best WBC mandatory for probably the last 10 years, and they screwed him over and over again. Now they are screwing him with the split as well. Finkel gives you facts, you are giving a biased opinion. WBC are the biggest joke in boxing. Boxing is dying because of corrupt **** like WBC organization.
Well the beautiful thing is that there is something called real life. We don't have to hide behind computers like cowards making accusations. We can find out in real life who is telling the truth. So why don't we place a very large wager on whether I have other accounts here. I'm willing to take a polygraph and turn over my internet records if you make it worth my while. Fury was WBC mandatory. Whyte won't be favored against Fury. Wilder was WBC mandatory. Whyte wouldn't be favored against Wilder. So you're definitely wrong. The WBC never screwed Whyte. He won a semi-final eliminator and the silver world championship, so they made him #1. Being #1 entitled him to a final eliminator to try to become mandatory. The WBC offered him numerous final eliminators and he kept turning them down. Nobody screwed Whyte. He just refused to fight to become mandatory. He wanted it to be given to him.
Unfortunately for fans, Whyte's head trainer just did an interview on Behind the Gloves a few hours earlier saying they are going to wait on arbitration in March. So it doesn't look like this saga is coming to an end any time soon.
Whyte trainer is just trying to save face. The sanctioning body has ordered a purse bid if they can’t come to an agreement in 30 days. So I have no idea what arbitration they are waiting on.
I don't know his motivations but the guy is quite clearly a fantasist. Making up historical rankings and fabricating events like Google hasn't existed for 20 years. Smh You shouldn't waste your time with him either. He's openly trolling at this point
I hope that is the case. But if arbitration is set for March, the WBC stating 80/20 unlikely changes anything, as they aren't the arbiters; the arbitration case was against them. Perhaps they got Whyte to drop arbitration based on making a judgement on the split, but 80/20 is below their rules and in alignment with what team Fury wanted - which seems unlikely to appease Whyte. But you never know, maybe Whyte just wanted to take it to purse bids. To be honest I just want to see Fury fight Whyte. Whyte is not going to get any favours from the WBC. So it feels like he should consider cutting his losses and take it to purse bids. However I'm not in his position, mine is just what I'd like to see happen as a fan of both, with the hope of getting undisputed sooner rather than later
Which is pathetic. Their own ***** rules said 30% for mandatory. And Whyte is even an Interim, which was 45%. I don't give a **** how much Fury or Whyte will make out of this fight, but WBC are corrupt piece of ****. Why they even have rules for that if they can pretty much do/decide whatever the ***** they want?
You're wrong. The current WBC rules and regulations, in effect since December 13, 2011, specifically say that interim champions are to be treated no differently than any other mandatory when it comes to purse bid splits. Interim WBC champions haven't been entitled to 45% in over a decade. That rule was removed a long time ago.
You're labeling me a troll because you didn't have your facts straight and I proved you wrong. I'll ask you again. Can you provide a recent example of a fighter winning an officially sanctioned WBC eliminator and only moving up to #9 after the fight?
Don't make me laugh dude, if you are keep with your nonsenses you are going to end up on my ignore list with some special names being in there. When exactly was Fury mandatory for the WBC ? Who exactly he beat to become such ? What exactly did Breaazeale did to become WBC mandatory? Getting smashes to AJ, and then have 3 fights against completely nobodies. How the ***** Stiverne become mandatory for WBC title? Beating Derrick Rossy, a guy who had 150 loses in his record, and Stiverne couldn't even KO him .... They were giving Wilder a pass, cause he obviously didn't fancy his chances against Whyte. Whyte was number 1 in WBC in the likes of 3-4-5 years.
Show me where it was remove, but not with your nonsenses, but with facts. Documented or pages where they clearly stated they removed it and that Interim would not be threaten differently than mandatory. I guess you obviously know more than Hearn and plenty of journalist, who also write about the Interim getting 45%. And even if that is the case, following their rules mandatory still has to get 30%.