Wilder #1 Heavyweight IF beats Fury

I don't blame you for lurking Some of the folks here are deranged.

 

Here's a FACT: AJ's resume is miles better than Wilder's.

Here's another FACT: AJ's resume is miles better than Fury's.

Here's an additional FACT: AJ is the consensus #1 at HW.

Don't do drugs, mmmk?

 

Please try and reign in the negativity. It's so unnecessary.

Saying some random things that are completely untrue then writing FACT next to it doesn't make it so.

AJ has a poor resume full of bums and has beens. He dreams of one day getting a name as good as Ortiz on there to prop it up. That is an example of an ACTUAL FACT.

Please try not to write the name Tyson Luke "The Gypsy King" Fury again. His resume is so much better than anyone else's at HW that it's not even relevant for you to talk about him.

 

Obviously, looking at your previous posts, I know this to be true.

Tryson McFatter "The Juicer King" is more appropriate.

No, actually it's not.

And after Wilder destroys him - and he will, sadly - its going to be even worse.

 

Again, another Mis-Matchroom sycophant is using his alt to try and denigrate me personally.

Wilder and Fury are fighting in a MEGA-EVENT to decide the best HW on planet Earth. Please stop attacking random online boxing experts like myself and instead try and enjoy the build up to this once in a generation unification fight.

 

Again, you seem so invested in creating mis-truths and internet propaganda. Why bother? Why not just enjoy the sport you claim to be a fan of?

Wilder-Fury to decide the true HW king. What a night it will be!!!!!!

 

Don't snort drain cleaner.

 

Yes I was.

Again, why would you ever think what I said was confusing or inconsistent? I don't mean to be insulting but you don't seem to be able to operate at the higher level I'm on here.

 

Again with the unproved personal attacks. We have two unbeaten elite HW champions fighting to see who is the Lineal Champ and true king at HW, but all you can think to do is go online and throw personal insults at boxing experts.

 

You spoke of Wilder's record saying:
Now pepper in a mess of Stiverne/Arreola/Molina/Szpilka types and you have a record to beat AJ'sby a small but significant margin.

Then claimed this:

Out of the top three HWs right now, AJ has by far the worst record. Wilder and Fury crap all over him.

These two statements are definitely not mutually exclusive.
Unless you're called Davo.

I'm just saying, we all appreciate the effort your putting in but to try and test my intellect because you slipped a bit...just...no Davo, not up to standard.

You literally say the difference between AJs record and Wilder's is "small" but then later claim both Fury and Wilder's record crap all over his.

Please do tell me how that is not a blatant contradiction, oh and make it patronising if poss! Cheers

 

I agree with you completely when you say, "These two statements are definitely not mutually exclusive".

They make perfect sense together. Wilder's record beats AJ's by a small but significant margin, but Wilder and Fury crap all over him. I said exactly what I meant and it makes perfect sense. Why do you keep bringing this up? Exactly what is your point? Please do try a bit harder to make a coherent point.

 

Ha ha, so quick too!
Made to order Davo, cheers.
Keep dropping those truth bombs g

 

Nah

 

I'm just going to assume you've seen your error, are too proud to admit you were wrong, so are now just randomly insulting me.

Under all the hate, I genuinely hope you are as excited for Wilder-Fury as the rest of us. It's going to be great night!

 

Don't inhale methane.