Povetkin looked like hell because Huck made him look like hell, and he lost, not changing my mind, and I also happen to think Huck would still put up a hell of a fight against Wilder and may beat him right now. And I'm not trolling Huck has the style to beat Fury, and not to quote MVC here, but that shot that Glowacki hit Huck with would have KO'd anybody.:deal
He won every round and beat the absolute **** out of him. The fight went as we all thought it would.... Povetkin outboxing and landing all sorts of hard shots on Wach with the latters now legendary chin holding up until the very end. So how do you look good against Wach?????
Povetkin fight /possibly/ is more $ for Wilder (not sure how much $ Fury fight can bring?) Povetkin has a good team backing him up in Russia, so thats why he is important, especially for Wilder as a Champion defending in Russia he gets paid big $ (near $17 Million) which will be Wilder highest payday Fury highest payday will be his rematch vs Wlad Obviously both Wlad & Povetkin think they will win, but they are the physical underdogs in both fights
He took an easy route to Wlad as did Pulev and many other Wlad challengers in recent years. The key difference being they stepped up to the plate when they got there and fought THE man in their division. Wilder fought a sickly, Don King manufactured hype job who'd been gifted a vacant title after a run of absolute stiffs that people don't even care to recall. As I say Fury's run wasn't great either but beating Chisora and Cunningham make a mockery of Wilder's best wins on his way up and then he beat one of the sports longest reigning and most dominant champions. Meanwhile Wilder has been doing anything and everything to avoid his mando whilst fighting the worst opposition available. You're not in a position to call out any of the current heavyweights on their actions if you won't condemn Wilder's ongoing bandwagon of BS. Deontay is making a fool of you guys.
No Povetkin was still suffering from Atlas' **** training/philosophy and s****ing by with mediocre performances in most of his big fights. The Povetkin we've seen post-Klitschko knocks any version of Huck into next week. I think Huck could beat a lazy and unmotivated Fury no question.... The kind of Fury who's an emotional wreck, out of shape and so on, but not the disciplined version we saw in Chisora II, Hammer, and Klitschko fights.
This is Wilder's M.O. Call oit people that would smash him then fight a bartender dubiously rated by the WBC (World Burger Circuit)
Just stfu. This answer alone shows your pathetic attempt at revenge for me calling Fury a bum. NOBODY cares that he's the hvw champ except his country, and you mentioning Chisora and ****en Cunningham shows us how perverse your boxing opinion is. You knew Fury's run was ****en weak and undeserving and yet you still wrote the above re****ed ****, lmao. Just stfu!
Do you realize how stupid you sound? Nobody outside of America cares about Wilder.... Hell, no one here aside from boxing fans gives a **** about him. What he said was the truth. Wilder fought the most pathetic collection of stiffs on his way to the belt, was thrown into a bogus eliminator against his friend who was coming off a loss to Chisora and then he won the belt against a mediocre fighter who like Wilder fought absolutely pathetic opposition on the way up AND won the belt in a very unimpressive fashion against a guy he already BEAT and shouldn't have been fighting for a vacant title. Clearly it's you who has an agenda here and is not willing to accept reality, like most Wilder fans.
Not in an impressive fashion Pretty much a shutout, in a fight you predicted Stiverne would knock Wilder out in 3. Hm.... Okay bro You got banned off a month and you're still trolling about that fight.
What's relevant here is that Wilder took an absolutely pathetic path before winning an extremely devalued version of the WBC world title. You can't seem to accept that.
I can't bring myself to talk to these clowns, lmao. Wilder having a belt means nothing to me. I'm watching his progress. They are moving him correctly towards the true title. They dis Wilders road towards his belt while I saw the Stiverne fight as a giant step up...and attempt to completely justify Fury's underserved title shot instead of just admitting that Fury's mouth got him a title shot. At least they can say that he beat Wlad now, lmao. What was the talk then?
HMMMMMMMMM you sure didn't have a problem with the fight when it was announced and you also said he would be knocked out fast. Once Wilder won, and of course after a month of bannage, you came back and you start ****ting on the performance. Sure it wasn't like he beat Vitali, but he beat a very good primed Stiverne.
I got caught up in my hatred of the fraud and didn't realize how bad Stiverne truly was. Had I studied the fight with a shot Ray Austin a little more I might have not been so confident in my pick. Stiverne is truly awful and his recent performance against Rossy further proves it and makes Wilders status as champion look even more questionable to serious onlookers. Again..... Not relevant. What we're debating is Wilders pathetic path to a world title, and how the WBC handled things after Vitali dropped the belt.
Too bad you can't debate the facts and can only post smileys to people who agree with your skewed view of things.