Wilder dared to be great, Canelo did not

STFU with your assumptions on me. You're the one crying here, trying to sell a turd as a diamond.

Oh, I see. You took enough training just to be able to talk **** to others and say you've trained. Guess that makes your opinion even stronger, right??? Cool story bro.

My emojis aren't to get a reaction from you jackass.... You're just being stupid here, trying to up Wilder for taking a rematch for the HW championship.

 

What?
Wife beating and being a poor loser?
Sitting on a belt for 5 yaers and fighting nobodies until he fought Fury as a cherry pick because he thought it would be an easy nights work..?
Wilder's career was always smoke and mirrors to anyone who knew what they were looking at.
Gee what an inspiration.....
Also nobody spat on Wilder's face. he just got exposed after being kept away from anyone with a pulse for several years on the trot.

 

Yes but this is the narrative that Wilder and Fury fanboys like to spin but frankly it's bollocks.
Both need to over inflate the other because both resume's are crap as only Fury has Vlad. that's the only elite fighter fought between the two of them. That is tragic compared to previous Champs. Fury has only 5 World Championship fights and three of them against Wilder.
Both resume's are garbage end of discussion.
Firstly Fury isn't the clear number 1 as he's not fought most of the other top guys. Yes he's undefeated but nobody knows how he squares up against either Joshua or Usyk. If either of those two become umdisputed then Fury will just be a foot note in this era that's just reality he will be the nearly man.
Now let's get on point "Wilder dared to be great rematching Fury" No he didn't it's not like he accepted he was beaten by the better man.
After the 2nd fight he was just making one excuse after another from the heavy costume to Fury having dodgy gloves and cheating. Wilder is that low in IQ and surrounded by yes men that he was deluded in thinking he was cheated. That's not the same as taking the loss like a man then making adjustments and then going back in the ring. That's overcoming that fear . what Wilder did is just pure delusion.

 

I expected better from you Glass City.

 

WTF did i criticize Wilder about? Read much?? All I said is he isn't daring to be great by taking a rematch.

I've been in fights before dumbass. You really have no clue what I am saying here do you?? Take some reading comprehension courses FFS....

If the emoji shows a laugh, it's ME laughing. Do you really not know how emojis work???

 

You need a life.... Just continue to pretend to know everything about strangers, that's a good look for you!

 

I disagree. The fact is we don't really know as both Wilder and Fury haven't fought the other top guys.
It's not a solid footing if your argument is this fighter could beat that fighter We base things on what's happened not what we think might happen.
Joshua was still a unified champ and making more than the other two put together before the trilogy. Another thing that Fury and Wilder fans do is they have to crap on Joshua who was the only one of the three trying to become undisputed.
I'm not a Joshua fanboy either I do push back with the Fury and Wilder fanboys and the fallacy narrative.
Of course it matters whether Willder accepted it as your point is about being brave whilst I'm asserting that he was deluded. It doesn't work both ways that's a paradox.

 

What a load of garbage from a mental fruit. Moving up to Light Heavyweight to face a naturally bigger opponent isn't taking risks all of a sudden. Go watch Golovkin vs Lemieux, moron.

 

Well Vlad is really from the previous era so that leaves Wilder who didn't fight any of the top guys other than Kong who also fought nobody.
So there's no context at all....
I never stated Joshua was better than Fury you just did. What I said is was it's not clear cut without the top guys all fighting each other.
The fact is Joshua fought far more top 10 guys and was trying to unify all the belts none of the others have other than Usyk so you have to give credit where it's due. The fact you don't means that you have a clear agenda.
Also you can't just dismiss a fighter with hindsight because that's also being dishonest. Parker was an undefeated belt holder and Whyte was undefeated and had been a handful for everyone before the Fury fight which was always a bad style matchup for him.
So no amount of your spinning will chamge my perspective as I'm looking at this objectively and you are not in this instance.