Wilder has a rematch clause if he loses to Fury

Yes I know your op wasn't really criticizing it.

My post was more directed at the numpties responding and behaving as if it was unheard of while pretending it gives an indication on a fighters confidence going into a fight.

When we know it's nothing more than an insurance policy.

 

Wilder vs. Stiverne III is looming in that case.

 

He's a commie...they don't use logic.

 

My post was a response to all the reply to the post, about rematch clause.

 

once he gets owned by fury he will retire....no way in hell he has the ballz to come to uk to fight

joshua vs fury in 2019 april.... mega fight

 

On the very unlikely case that he loses Wilder would most likely take the rematch because it would be a lucrative
option more so than the first fight.. Why??

Because Fury would be considered "back" so to speak as opposed to now where we have no idea where he is..

Plus he has that right hand and it would have to connect once on two fights..

 

Once Wilder loses then its game over for him, his appeal to casual fans will wither and possible threat to AJ diminish.

He is a fart in the wind, soon to disperse, and then the HW division can breathe again under British rule.

 

I think in a rematch he'd have less of a chance, as this one is a bit soon, and Fury should have figured out Wilder.

That is IF Fury stays motivated, as he's said himself that if he wins there's a good chance of him getting depressed again. But if he doesn't he probably won't fight at all.

 

It doesn't work like that.
You get rematch clauses to safeguard against things out of the fighters control, I.e taking a cut in the 5th rd and going to the cards, or freak accidents like shoulder dislocations. Bad refs and judging are other things needed to safeguard against

 

If he really was that confident he would win there'd be no rematch. He's getting his arse handed to him by Fury in this and we all know it.

There won't be a rematch anyway.

 

See post above