I dont know, what message should we get from the organizations? I thought that was the whole point of the belts, your laughing at it so i must be wrong. Whats the points of climbing the rankings and winning the belts then? What does it mean if it isnt meant to represent that? Tell you what mate, ive not read much of your thoughts on here but it seems to me that you know Farooq all.
You want compromise, how's this? Twenty years in the can I wanted manicott', but I compromised. I ate grilled cheese off the radiator instead. I wanted to f*** a woman, but I compromised. I jacked off into a tissue. You see where I'm goin'?
Why? Why 50-50? Why wasnt Floyd dishing out 50-50? Or Canelo? Why dont they need to but Joshua does? Compared to what Wilder does Joshua is like Floyd or Canelo, Wilder isnt even close. Joshua also has all the belts bar 1. Why should it be 50-50? Unless you are saying that how far Hearn may need to go to secure the fight in which case i agree but he certainly shouldnt have to. Wilder on average gives up about 10% split to his B side opposition so if anybody understands A side B side its him.
Hearn gives Fury 50% on two fight deal , the second fight 55% if he wins only. Joshua defeats him twice ..... Wilder then has no angles to use and it's forced on him . That's your compromise with someone and someone's who will be a unreasonable problem!
Do they want the fight or not? If you really want the fight you give them half or you insult them, especially since he is champion and he just had a big fight. If they don't want it offer him 70-30
Joshua is just building a cover story to fight the critiscism of facing Whyte or Chisora in April. They never had any serious intention of making a deal with Wilder and he doesn't want fury because he doesn't know what lineal is so isn't interested in getting that. They just want to milk the ticket buying public and ppv viewers dry with matchroom fighter house shows before taking any risky fights.
Well then ****ing insult them then. When they bring 50% to the table they can have 50%. A side B side has been fine for American A sides for years, they never dished out 50-50 and the other side accepted that they were the B side. But your so blaze about it now.
I don't know. If you think that way the fight will not be made. I am just saying how the fight will be made.
Old men and bums? Any professional boxer would murder you in the ring ,you have no credibility and come accross as an idiot . .
If Wilder accepts an offer for much more money than he has ever earnt from a fight, gets a rematch clause with the return fight being in America and a chance to gamble his 1 belt against Joshuas 4, Just how much is he having to compromise there? But thats where we are at and its not enough, Joshua needs to compromise to make this fight happen?
You are right, i think that is what is going to have to be done to get this fight made but i just dont see why Wilder cant accept hes the B side, hes still set to gain massively its not like he would be getting short changed in anyway but i dont see why he should get the same as Joshua when he doesnt put in anywhere near as much as Joshua.