Wilder-Klitschko this fall for the WBC/WBA/WBO titles?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Dubblechin, Jun 10, 2016.


  1. Dubblechin

    Dubblechin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,643
    18,454
    Jun 25, 2014
    If Wlad Klitschko wins the rematch with Fury July 9, and Wilder takes care of Arreola a week later (July 16), will we see Klitschko-Wilder in a unification this fall?

    Wlad wanted to pick up all the belts before he retired.

    Vitali Klitschko has a lot of pull with the WBC. (I think he still might be their emeritus champ.)

    What are the chances we'll get Wilder-Klitschko?
     
  2. ForemanJab

    ForemanJab Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,996
    12,322
    May 8, 2014
    I don't think Wilder would want to fight him to be honest. In any case he will probably still have to fight Povetkin after he gets cleared.
     
  3. UnleashtheFURY

    UnleashtheFURY D'oh! Full Member

    73,139
    39,619
    Sep 29, 2012
    Wlad even at 45 sparks Wilder.
     
  4. Dubblechin

    Dubblechin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,643
    18,454
    Jun 25, 2014
    Maybe so. Maybe not.

    Would be a nice way to end the year with three of the heavyweight titles unified.
     
  5. Dubblechin

    Dubblechin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,643
    18,454
    Jun 25, 2014
    They (Klitschko-Wilder) were in talks about fighting in 2016 before Wlad fought Fury late last year.

    If Wlad avenges his loss, I don't know why his (Wlad's) plans would change.
     
  6. UnleashtheFURY

    UnleashtheFURY D'oh! Full Member

    73,139
    39,619
    Sep 29, 2012
    Wilder has no chin, no defense, poor coordination/footwork. Wlad is becoming an old man but even at 45 he'd be in good enough shape to KO a badly flawed fighter like Wilder. It's a downhill decline once your reach you mid 30s. But Wlad probably won't change MUCH until he reaches his mid 40s. It's killers like Joshua, Parker that Wlad has to be worried about. Fury too. Wilder has nothing for him.
     
  7. Dubblechin

    Dubblechin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,643
    18,454
    Jun 25, 2014
    Except the WBC belt.

    So, you're saying you think Wlad will still want that fight then this fall if he beats Fury in their return?

    I think he (Wlad) will, too.
     
  8. UnleashtheFURY

    UnleashtheFURY D'oh! Full Member

    73,139
    39,619
    Sep 29, 2012
    I'm talking about in the ring Sherlock. Obviously Wilder has his paper WBC belt that was handed to him on a platter.
     
  9. ForemanJab

    ForemanJab Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,996
    12,322
    May 8, 2014
    Can you link a source to these negotiations? Wilder's entire career to this point has been about avoiding the most risk possible. If Povetkin loses his mando spot I think a fight with Joshua down the line is far more likely than a Klitschko fight.
     
  10. UnleashtheFURY

    UnleashtheFURY D'oh! Full Member

    73,139
    39,619
    Sep 29, 2012
    Avoiding risk until the inevitable cash out.

    It's coming soon I'm sure.....

    Wlad/Fury II winner
    Unification with Joshua at Wembley
     
  11. madballster

    madballster Loyal Member Full Member

    37,210
    6,765
    Jul 21, 2009
    If Wlad wins vs. Fury the smart thing would be to do a trilogy vs. Fury. Most cash, most prestige. Wilder likely will lose to Povetkin, Wlad would then unify vs. him.

    Let's see Wlad win first though, it won't be easy given his age and lack of motivation.
     
  12. Dubblechin

    Dubblechin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,643
    18,454
    Jun 25, 2014
    They aren't going to fight in Wembley in November ... Sherlock.

    Wlad will go after Wilder first, if he beats Fury in the rematch. (If Fury wins, I don't think Wilder and Fury will fight anytime soon.)

    But, should Wlad win, I think Wlad-Wilder this fall in a unification is nearly a given.
     
  13. MVC!

    MVC! The Best Ever Full Member

    60,129
    5,612
    Nov 5, 2013
    You will never give him any credit, will you?

    More than 70% of ESB said Stiverne would KO him in less than 4 rounds.

    How was it handed to him on a silver platter?

    :huh
     
  14. UnleashtheFURY

    UnleashtheFURY D'oh! Full Member

    73,139
    39,619
    Sep 29, 2012
    I give him SOME credit. Clearly he's a lot better than I thought he'd be, and he's proven me wrong in some fights. He's beaten some ok fighters but no one great. But still... My main criticism of him still stands. He's a badly coddled fraud who steers clear of top fighters and welcomes low risk opponents. Molina, Duhaupas, and now Arreola. I give him some credit for Szpilka, although that should have been his first or 2nd voluntary defense NOT 3rd.
     
  15. UnleashtheFURY

    UnleashtheFURY D'oh! Full Member

    73,139
    39,619
    Sep 29, 2012
    How the WBC handled things after Vitali retired was disgraceful... It didn't start with Wilder. The disgraceful tournament they had involving Stiverne, Arreola, Banks and Mitchell(they obviously desperately wanted Arreola as champ)

    Then the bogus eliminator that was Wilder/Scott. What the hell did Scott do to land himself in an eliminator? He was coming off pathetic showing to Chisora, and somehow he lands himself in an eliminator for one of the mostly highly regarded belts? Dodgy to say the least.