The second is based on unified heavyweight title fights on U.S. PPV and the current rate of PPVs in the U.S. which cost three times more than they charge in the UK. Although, I'm sure you're right. Nobody would even think to put Wilder-Joshua on PPV in the US. I'm sure none of the millions of people who have been watching Wilder in the U.S. would buy it. And I'm sure Hearn wouldn't charge more in the UK for a Wilder-Joshua unification. It's a money loser. You caught me. How foolish of me. Back to Joshua vs. the Charr/Oquendo winner. Who do you got in that one?
They aren't his mandatories. Joshua has to fight the winner, or give up the WBA belt. Then they become Wilder opposition ... and Wilder becomes the WBA AND WBC champ (LOL).
And something Joshua is going to learn A LOT about after Saturday, if he wins. THREE MANDOS in a row. And none of them are David Haye or Tyson Fury or Deontay Wilder or Dillian Whyte or anyone who would generate more than the same old same old.
Povetkin is the WBA mandatory. He’s fighting Price on the Joshua undercard. Povetkin would put up a better fight than Wilder.
Ring me when wilder faces a mandatory. Ya im sure Joshua is dreading facing what ever plebs the sanctioning bodies line up for 30 million a pop. If they keep doing that too him he will end up a billionaire the poor sod
Incidentally wilder has spent 3 years making no effort to unify the belts so how come in your scenario he suddenly starts accumulating them as soon as they are stripped from Joshua? Is he not more likely to revert to type and fight a variety of al Haymons special selections? You do realise that at any time AJ can outbid wilder should he wish to recapture one of these belts?