Wilder-Stiverne II is upon us, confirmed by WBC

You are correct. GGG fought mandatories.and those were average middleweights.

But the thread was about Wilder. Yes,good call up the hypocritres.

what you think about Wilder vs Stiverne?can you please not compare to other fighters.

my ring bells one thing. Wilder is protected and limited. All the evidence is on tape and the opponents.

but this is PRIZE fighting.so i understand why team Wilder does it.

How much Wilder now makes?milk that money and cash out in the end. It's all about business.

 

Stiverne is the worst and most undeserving bum yet and its been called a mandatory.

 

Let's be fair to Wilder. He could have fought Arreola again but didn't Clearly he's trying to deliver quality matches for his many (12) fans

Seriously, though, if I were in Wilder's place I would have complained about this "mandatory" as being too embarrassing.

 

Yes but the fat is a tactical plan to intimidate Wilder. He's going to have Dustin Nichols flashbacks

 

dodged a bullet? Wilder is one of the poorest heavyweight champs of recent years, only Charles Martin and Parker are behind him, Wilder has had 38 odd wins with 1 notable name and thats the only fight that has gone the distance, His record is just like Chavez Sr, fighting bums and journeymen in 30 and 40 fights, as soon as he fights a top HW he gets exposed and beaten up and brutally knocked out.

 

How did Stiverne get the mandatory position without facing an eliminator? This is a disgrace.

 

Wrong, you already apologized and admitted the errors of your ways. As a man, I will accept it gracefully.

Ok man?!

 

By getting stunned by Rossy in the first round I guess!

 

How was Stiverne granted an opportunity to fight in an eliminator (which was nullified by Povetkin's positive test) in the first place? All he achieved after getting beaten up by Wilder is a win over Rossy, a journeyman and he even struggled in that bout, kissed the canvas.

 

What was the first bout, a near 12 round shut out for Wilder? Why would they think that anyone would want to see a rematch?

 

the rules of boxing are meant to dictate the outcome. its isnt just promoters corrupting the sport its also the wbc and all them all body of organizations. wbc is protecting wilder there makin money of him n there belt. why mandate him to fight ortiz?? or any one else good n risk him losing . only guy that can have the same power is aj an they will make that fight eventually but for now there milking it. why else do they let him voluntarily defend his belt 5 times? versus competition that really shouldnt be fight for the most pretigious belt. and wilder has been fighting good fighters dont get that twisted but there not the guys that should of been competing for the most prestigious belt.

 

Can we nip this malarkey in the bud? There is no "most prestigious" belt anymore. They've all made utter farces of themselves at one time or another either through blatant corruption or sheer incompetence. WBA and WBC both hand out "world titles" under the guises of "silver", "interim" or "regular" basically for being the mandatory challenger. Then there's the current Wilder situation making the WBC look like fools; granting him 5 voluntaries and then having Stiverne as mandatory is an absolute joke. The Lebedev/Gassiev situation and the fact that Paul Smith is somehow the 5th best SMW are both massive tarnishes for the WBA's credibility. IBF? Charles f*cking Martin, need I say more? Right now the WBO is the least hilarious, but it's really only a matter of time before they make some kind of blunder.

 

No man. Your a child.

Plus you are a biased one at that. Just be real.

 

ok its not the most prestigious i respeect that . there all equal i guess . but other than u agree?

 

I wouldn't talk if I was you LOL. But I do accept your apology. You're just very negative and caught on your lying.

But like I said, I do accept your apology.