Rewatched both fights, both Wilder and Wlad were 29 and both boxed very similarly, however the main difference was Wilder stood up to Stiverne's best shots, whilst Wlad hit the canvas multiple times against Peter. Wilder was still a contender whereas Stiverne was a defending champion with a ton of professional and amateur experience. Wlad had already held the WBO world title before meeting Peter for the first time whilst Wilder was still untested and had never gone past 4 rounds. When you compare Wlad's effort against Fury to Wilder's imo it shows Wilder was the better fighter with more heart and a far better chin and he managed to drop Fury with his right hand in the 12th round in their first meeting whereas Fury shook off Wlad's right hand in the 12th round of their meeting, so I think Wilder also had the edge in power. I think Wilder would have brutally stopped Wlad if Wlad was unable to outbox Wilder. If Wilder started boxing earlier I think he would have been a far more complete fighter than he is today. What do you guys think, how would Wlad and Wilder have went? Deontay Wilder v Bermane Stiverne highlights - YouTube Wladimir Klitschko vs Samuel Peter 1 Highlights. - YouTube
It is my understanding that a past-prime Wlad shared the ring many times with a young Wilder in sparring and destroyed him. Knocked him out cold several times. Wlad is a MUCH more skilled boxer, has a higher Ring IQ, and has just as much power as Wilder. (And, Wlad carries it in both hands, unlike Wilder) Their chins are close to the same. Neither has a very good ability to weather hard shots. With Wlad's chin and Wilder's power anything is possible. But, what is most likely is that Wlad wastes Wilder 8-9 times out of 10.
https://www.*******.com/wilder-not-rushed-klitschko-says-finkel--86714 His own manager not wanting him to take the fight which tells you all you need to know.
I agree, even though I “heard” Wlad beating (a green) Wilder in sparring I think Wilder KO’s Wlad cold in a match. Wilder’s chin is also way better than Wlad’s.
Every fighter fully blossoms at different times. How about 33-34 year old Wilder in with 33-34 year old Wlad?? Different breed of fighter Wilder would be up against huh. And that Sam Peter (Before getting his chin cracked) KO’s Stiverne. Do us a favor… don’t even mention Wilder and Wlad in the same sentence again
Deontay Wilder hailed as 'hardest punching heavyweight ever' by David Haye who opens up on brutal power in sparring | The Sun Haye shared a ring with that version of Wlad. The sparring Haye refers to in this article took place back when Haye was scheduled to face Fury in 2013 and Wilder was extremely green back then.
Fresh take. I like it. Wilder's first fight against Stiverne is an underrated performance. Wilder broke his hand when he floored Bermane and basically had to box his way to victory. Many fighters in their first title fight would've panicked after breaking their hand and losing their best offensive weapon so early in the fight. But we've learned over the years that Wilder has a true fighter's heart. Under distress early in his career, Wlad fell apart against Purity. He collapsed in a heap against Brewster. Wlad even kind of wormed his way out of the Davarryl Williamson fight after getting dropped. To his credit, though, he did keep getting up against Sam Peter. An actual fight between Wlad and Wilder at similar ages would've been interesting.
I seen them spar when Peter was champion and Stiverne was undefeated and up and coming, it was even so I’m not sure it’s a definite Peter’s win. Fun info, I had sparred Stiverne a few times before that, nothing crazy but good sparring. I was only around 215lb at the time and when I was asked to “jump in” my answer was a quick “**** NO!”, when they sparred it was definitely crazy.
Peter's two bouts with Toney shame Stiverne's entire pathetic career. Prime for prime peter ko's Stiverne inside four rounds.
When attempting to analyze fighters based on performances against a common opponent, its never wise to take a 39 year olds performance in his second to last fight of his career, and compare it to a prime fighters performance. Naturally, the fighter that is past prime will do worse. Not to mention, its likely the Fury Wlad fought was better than the one Wilder fought the first fight. How would a 39 year old Wilder do against a prime Fury?
Sam Peter was better than Stiverne. Wlad was past his best vs Fury. Wilder hits incredibly hard, maybe even harder than Wlad did.
As for the Peter and Stiverne fights, theres much more to the matchups and performances than 'Wilder did better against his shorter charger than Wlad did against his'. - Prime Peter set a much faster and more explosive pace than Stiverne. Look at notoriously lazy Stivernes punch output against Wilder. Round 1 : 20 punches throw (Peter threw 64 punches against Wlad in the first round). Peter threw more punches against Wlad in the first round than Stiverne threw in the first three rounds against Wilder. This is an apples and oranges comparison. - To a lesser extent, Peter mixed in his jabs slightly better. Peter did a better job at trying to work in his jab. In one sequence he throws three jabs and ends with a cross (does Stiverne throw one 4 punch combination in the entire Wilder fight?) An offense is always going to be more effective when a fighter uses their jab more. --------------- Ultimately, Peter and Stiverne apply different kinds of pressure. Stiverne applies lazy heavy bag pressure. He plods forward absorbing punches then tries exploding every so often with one or two power shots every so often. Peter applies hyper aggressive pressure with higher output and behind a jab. Peters aggression is a higher level than Stivernes, and that kind of pressure is harder to deal with. The Peter that Wlad fought in that fight was a better fighter than the Stiverne Wilder fought.