Wilder vs Breazeale was ALWAYS going to be next

And Big Baby KO the robot

 

Wlad had a choice between Wilder and AJ and he chose to fight AJ. He said it himself. He liked his chances better with AJ plus it was a bigger fight in that the people had fell in love with AJ and was sure to spend money.

 

More serious than a heart attack, all you have to do is match up the fighters.

 

This isn't true at all .

The original negotiations started in 2016 for Klitschko and Joshua. At that time Wilder was fighting the great Chris Arreola a hand picked opponent ( shocking ) . A month after that fight negotiations talks between AJ and Klitschko started .That fight was scheduled for Nov.2016. after Pulev ran off.

Klitschko wasn't going to play games chasing Wilder , Joshua was and still IS the recognized number one Heavyweight able to do mega PPV fights and so forth. Klitschko doesn't waste time he always fights the best and thought Joshua was well before he fought him.

Please show me where Klitschko said he liked his chances with AJ better as the reason he fought him ? Lol

 

It was an interview that Klitschko was giving and the question was asked why he chose to fight Joshua. As for negotiations, they get started all the time but it don't mean much these days. Ask Fury. Actually Wilder had two fights in 2016 but that don't mean that talk of him and Klitschko wasn't taking place. You say Klitschko always fights the best, then you can explain why all them bums is on his resume. As a matter of fact, AJ had three fights in 2016. April, June, and Dec. So if he can fight three times and still negotiate why can't Wilder negotiate with two. Then again, Wilder won his belt in 2015 and AJ in 2016 Wilder fought three bums in a row and so did AJ so where is the better fighter? AJ had two mandatories, Pulev and Ortiz, when Pulev reneged, Joshua still back peddled on Ortiz so who's zooming who. He might be big in the UK but Wilder is the man in the US. I am not gonna ask you to show me the negotiation papers are any articles where they stated that they were negotiating because it don't prove nothing but I know what I saw and heard. Now run and tell that.

 

No AJ never said he feels Wilder is better . He said the best time to fight him is now because he will be to good and I will be to old down the line. He's always said Joshua was the future not Wilder.

So your going to say negotiations don't mean much based on FURY ? I'm not even going to address that. Lol

O.K so you then went off on Klitschko bum list ?

You said Joshua had two mandatory challengers in 2016 ? This is also fake news .Ortiz wasn't ordered to fight Joshua until after April 29 th 2017 and had certain time period. This is also not true anyway because his first mandatory Pulev wasn't done yet and Klitschko cancelled the rematch which stalled time.

Joshua last fight in 2016 WAS a Klitschko replacement , in a fight STILL scheduled for April 29 th 2017 ....negotiations don't mean much right ? Lol

I think I need to put you in my head case section, there's no need to go further here , obviously you must be a Wilder fan which means this won't go anywhere...... even though I just explained to you the Wilder fight wasn't possible , so what do you do ?

You associated Joshua fighting bums with Wilder and made it about resumes which you KNOW isn't going to work with Wilder for OBVIOUS reasons and said Wilder is more known here ( he's not ) which has nothing to do with nothing !

P.S Wilder asking for EASY touches picking Wawarzyk in 2017 to TEST his hand out which became Washington and your telling me Klitschko picked Joshua because he's an easier target when by Wilders own admission wasn't looking for difficult fights after Arreola but are claiming he was an option for Klitschko anyway well after Klitschko agreed to fight Joshua in 2016......got to be a Wilder fan !

 

You just rambling now. Shook like a crook. You started the post not knowing if you was talking about AJ or Klitschko. Nothing to see or learn here so I will just agree to disagree.

 

No, you as a wilder fan didnt like what you read as you were all over the place and cant refute anything I posted so I DARE you ? lol

"The reason this fight happened is because Gerald Washington is the guy Deontay Wilder wanted to fight,” DiBella said."


Washington was ranked 25th when this happened and then placed him in top 10 because Wilder wanted the fight. It also happens to still be wilders 3rd best win . lol


This is the guy you are parading around defending with lies and you have the nerve to claim wilders resume is better then Joshua's ? Not sure if you are really stupid or a really bad troll ? lol


Are you even aware by this forums OWN ranking system they go by which is the

" Transnational Rankings " Wilder has fought ZERO top 10 guys in title fights as the champion when he fought them, Fury wasn't even one and is now ranked over him ? lol

Breazeale isn't even there either...oh boy.............................................................

yea sure wilders resume is better............................ " In Wilder World " wherever the hell that is ??????




Sorry but when you respond to me with fake news like the last post that doesn't work.

 

Fact is that you talk to much about nothing, Evidently you have a need to be thought of as intelligent. The only problem is that you open your mouth and expose yourself. I agreed to disagree and keep it moving yet here you are again talking about nothing,

 

At least Wilder is fighting a mandatory.

 

True 1 mandatory in 4 years is ludicrous more so when you consider that mandatory was a shot overweight Stiverne. It's not a horrible fight in my opinion, better than Joshua/Miller in fact at least Breazeale has fought at the top level before.

 

Viewed within the context of Wilder's **** poor resume this fight is something of a step up. Whatever his limitations, Breazeale is 9 on Boxrec, 10 on PBO, doesn't make Ring top ten but otherwise he's a credible top ten HW who is in his prime and doesn't have any fitness / inactivity issues. Given Ortiz and Fury did I think this may be the first time that he's actually fought someone like this since he got the belt. I don't think Wilder should get any stick for facing him, the stick should be for the dross he's chosen to fight in the past and keep a bit for the WBC for the bizarre process that made DB mandatory to begin with. Deontay though gets a pass and I'm looking forward to the fight.

 

No you wanted to agree to the fact you didn't post anything factual but wanted to act like it's a point of view differences?

You out right lied.

if you didn't you would actually show me how Klitschko picked Joshua because he was easier ? ( I just gave You a detailed description why that's not true )

You would show me Ortiz was a mandatory for Joshua in 2016 (he was actually more Klitschko and can easily be proven false )

You would show why negotiating is not important even though the Joshua and Klitschko fight came off ? Lol


You would show how and prove Klitschko fought bums ? ( remember your a Wilder fan )

You would show me why and COMPARE Wilders opponents to AJs to prove he's better resume ? ( joke)


These are all the things you claimed on the thread and your questioning my intelligence ?

 

If you don't know the bums that Klitschko has fought or the fact that negotiations don't really seal a deal or that Ortiz was Joshua's mandatory or how to compare Wilder's and Joshua's resume's then you are dumber than I thought. That's knowledge that any boxing person has access to. It's not my job to pull up information for you. Check it out. If I am wrong then make me know it or kick rocks,