Wilder vs Ortiz 2 - Rematch Prediction Video

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Rumsfeld, Oct 30, 2019.


  1. BoJangles

    BoJangles Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,475
    1,293
    Apr 27, 2013
    I heard Dustin Nichols gave Grandpa Kong some inside info on the Check-Jab and the sweet spot to land it on Beyoncé that's sure to make Beyoncé crawl around on the canvas!
     
  2. young_wolverine

    young_wolverine Member Full Member

    293
    248
    May 31, 2019
    Great video Rummy you think this will be Ortiz's last fight if he loses?
     
    pacas likes this.
  3. DynamicMoves

    DynamicMoves Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,743
    1,920
    Sep 15, 2010
    I was annoyed with the doctor too but call it for what it is, it certainly wasn't a "1+ minute" checkup.
     
  4. anjawnaymiz

    anjawnaymiz Can we get Ivan Dychko some momentum Full Member

    8,263
    6,072
    Sep 6, 2008
    @Rumsfeld

    it’s about time someone gave you a job doing this, very professional
     
    young_wolverine likes this.
  5. GALVATRON

    GALVATRON Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    7,694
    4,245
    Oct 30, 2016
    The bettors would make a fortune bc Rummy himself admits he gets it wrong a lot so Theres always the insider to go against and is self admitted humble not to listen to him ? lol

    Havent seen this video yet im sure its very good and i'll be betting the opposite of rummy ( just kidding) not for this one, I like Wilder in 5 bc of inactivity of Ortiz . Wonder if rummy caught that difference of about 5 months longer then the last fight which will effect Ortiz here ? I hope im wrong again but lets just say Ortiz defeating wilder is very slim this time around,its a huge handicap and the insiders know it ,its why the odds are what they are.
     
  6. ellerbe

    ellerbe Loyal Member Full Member

    39,160
    15,949
    Jul 25, 2014
    Good to see your youtube channel blew up man. Don't forget us little people now that you're big time, I was supporting since day 1!
     
  7. Sephiroth Rising 7

    Sephiroth Rising 7 'No tears please!' banned Full Member

    9,483
    8,779
    Sep 27, 2016
    Wilder had actually danced his back way into the neutral corner, so didn't need to be ordered


    This content is protected


    So why would the referee did to order him there when he is no in the centre of the ring and is heading there anyway?

    There goes that flimsy argument that Fury should have had more time.


    Now let me present facts which cannot be disputed. Jack Reiss already made his feelings known prior to and after the fight admitting that he was never go to count Fury out.

    He committed serious level of misconduct both during the fight and after the fight which has been brushed under the carpet,

    When fury was standing after rising to his feet, the action should have resumed immediately which are the RULES which the ref completely ignored.

    Instead he was afforded with more time to have a jog around the ring and clear his head. That's corruption.

    In his own words he was counting and thinking about the good of boxing rather than adhering to the ruling system.
     
  8. Stuart_boxer

    Stuart_boxer Member Full Member

    128
    110
    Jun 12, 2019
    A YouTube channel isn’t a job?

    Great video btw, I watched this yesterday before I logged on.
     
  9. minemax

    minemax Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,993
    4,783
    Nov 10, 2017
    @Rumsfeld could do live streaming events occasionally (discussing next videos, for example, what should be in them or something like that) and collect money via Super Chat.
     
  10. sid

    sid Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,756
    2,844
    Nov 2, 2013
    Great Vid Rummy thx.
     
  11. Stuart_boxer

    Stuart_boxer Member Full Member

    128
    110
    Jun 12, 2019
    Sounds a bit old fashioned.

    I’m pretty sure boxing legends TV and a few other channels have made tens of thousands from YouTube ads.

    The best way for Rummy to make money on his videos if he isn’t already would be to set up a Gofundme for a lawyer. His content should be protected under fair use/freedom of speech commentary/criticism law.

    I’d have thought the alternative would be the ad money goes to the likes of Golden Boy/Top Rank/HBO or other fat cats already earning millions.
     
  12. Leeroy84

    Leeroy84 Lancashire-la-la-la Full Member

    1,081
    1,290
    May 7, 2016
    Fimsy argument??? did you forget to read the rules??.... Reiss was counting, regardless of where Deontay was "heading to next"

    The counting should of stopped, and begun again when Deontay reached the neutral corner

    Go read the rules properly and apply them to the video you posted (thanks for that btw) before remarking in such a silly manner.
     
  13. Sephiroth Rising 7

    Sephiroth Rising 7 'No tears please!' banned Full Member

    9,483
    8,779
    Sep 27, 2016
    The count started when DW was in his corner.

    The argument is flimsy because whether Wilder was in his corner at the start of the count, has no bearing on Fury's condition, or the result of the fight.

    Do you not understand how banaland arbitary it is to be complaining that the fighter who knocked the guy done wasn't standing in the right position?

    What effect exactly did that have on Fury being on the floor?

    The morepertinent point is that Fury was given another 10 seconds to clear his head, which you haven't addressed. That had a direct bearing on both the fight itself and the result.

    An opponent being situated in their corner or not doesn't. It's clutching at straws.

    Jack Reiss admitted he did not go by according to the rules when counting which is misconduct.

    Now try and debate that and fail
     
  14. Leeroy84

    Leeroy84 Lancashire-la-la-la Full Member

    1,081
    1,290
    May 7, 2016

    My point is the hypocrisy of you complaining one issue whilst completely ignoring the other.

    Now, If Reiss made the error you suggest, then you have to admit he made the error you've kindly shown in the video you posted, which is that if Reiss had seen Wilder, the count should of stopped until he returned to the corner.

    There's no debate, I did not make the rules and you posted the video.

    Stop being blinded by fanboyism, you look atrociously silly but I'm starting to think that's the point of your posts and I'm being lured in by even acknowledging them.

    And just so you know, I don't fanboy to any fighter the way you do, I don't give a **** about fat drug cheat Fury, It was just hilarious watching the fat tub of lard make a fool of Wilder, even after the knockdown.
     
  15. Sephiroth Rising 7

    Sephiroth Rising 7 'No tears please!' banned Full Member

    9,483
    8,779
    Sep 27, 2016
    There's no hypocrisy since Wilder being his corner when the count began had absolutely no bearing on the fight.

    It's arbitrary. If you can't understand that then I can't help. Jack Reiss giving Furuy extra time, stalling his count and not resuming the action had a direct bearing on the fight.

    It's nothing to do with fanboyism, as many are well aware I call out all referee's in all bouts regardless if I support the fighter or not if corruption has taken place.

    And Jack Reiss has form for corruption, so I will call out his actions. He himself knows he did wrong which is why he came out after the fight in a defensive stance ranting and raving attacking those who questioned ( since it's not just me who noticed what he was doing) trying to explain away his bias.

    He admitted he admired Fury so much that he couldn't count him out. That's on record.

    If you want to ignore that and go into silly mode comparing that level of bias to him forgetting to order Wilder to his corner, then that;s your problem.

    The difference is one was a genuine oversight which had no bearing on the fight, while the other mistake was willfully bias designed to provide advantage.

    As for looking silly, there was only one fighter left flat on their back with their eyeballs rolled to the back of their head and left with the fear of brain damage.
     
    Last edited: Oct 31, 2019