Wilder vs Szpilka is an extremely good HW fight. Two big hw punchers

Wilder- "Jennings isn't on my level."

Tries to sign fighter Jennings dominated and knocked out.

The clown show continues.
He may even sink lower and try shot to bits Arreola now. Apparently Szpilka to dangerous

 

Did he really say that?

 

Deontay Wilder simply picked an opponent similar to Povetkin with good KO power & a lone loss just like Povetkin. Takam failed to win 3 times & lost vs Povetkin...which makes him a poor choice, just like Wawrzyk, make up your mind, do you want Wilder to fight Povetkin former opponents or not :deal

We can't prove Szpilka is better than Povetkin or vice versa cause they never faced each other, both have near identical records & of similar ethnos, an important psychological factor :think

When that happens we can use Statistics & ****yze things from there, so we will include Takam to further help your agenda.

Face value records:
- Povetkin 30-1-0 (winner 97%)
- Szpilka 25-1-0 (winner 96%)
- Takam 33-2-1 (winner 92%)

Wins vs Opposition ratio:
- Povetkin (First)
- Szpilka (Second)
- Takam (Third)

Face-Face
- Povetkin (First) by beating Takam
- Szpilka (Second) NO CHANGE
- Takam (Third) by losing to Povetkin

So in theory you can argue that Povetkin is better than Szpilka, but on the same basis of your claim you put Takam clearly below Szpilka :thumbsup

 

Szpilka is the style of opponent that Wilder need to face so he can be better prepared for Potvekin. Wilder vs Potvekin will be soon to follow

 

Lol how?
Fighting a southpaw no matter the style is vastly different.

This content is protected

 

They screwed up only offering Glazkov 250k. That's all I'm saying.

This content is protected

 

Similar EE type, what a load of BS. Szpilka fights nothing like Povetkin, he is a cagey southpaw who uses a lot of movement and has a somewhat unorthodox style, he doesn't fight flat footed like Povetkin. I'm pretty sure you never saw him fight, you are just doing some MVC level trolling here.

 

Similar EE type, what a load of BS. Szpilka fights nothing like Povetkin, he is a cagey southpaw who uses a lot of movement and has a somewhat unorthodox style, he doesn't fight flat footed like Povetkin. I'm pretty sure you never saw him fight, you are just doing some MVC level trolling here.[/quote]
agreed. Glazkov would have been million dollar preparation.
They should have shot Duva 500k. It might have paid off in the long run.

This content is protected

 

That's a very stupid stereotype.

 

What does Glaskov have to offer? A feather fisted plodder with quicksand for feet and no desire to win? He's nothing more than a punching bag for Wilder to ko. At least Szpilka quick hands, power, movement and the will to win.

 

Fascinating, isn't it? There are people on this forum who claim they watch boxing and yet they end up thinking that all EE fighters have the same style. Szpilka fights like Povetkin, then I guess Golota also fought like Wladimir Klitschko, Lebedev fights like Usyk, Pirog fought like Golovkin, Gradovich fights like Lomachenko...

 

I stand corrected, I will elaborate more:

Its better to have an EE opponent rather than Takam, that having little to do with anything stylistic other than adding interest based on the tension...

Tension associated with Deontay Wilder reign & the hopeful expectations of those who dislike Wilder due to his genetic make up

Read it in a Larry Merchant slur :smoke

 

Yeah. Very ignorant.

 

I don't know about tension or interest but Takam is a lot more similar to Povetkin than Spzilka is, style-wise.

 

And New.................