Wilder vs. Wlad (2017) who wins?

DW would land first now, but last year VS that wlad (that fight Aj) pick em.
Favor DW to land and hurt him first

 

Klitchko would ko wilder. The difference in footwork and technique, IQ is miles apart, and Klitchko has that one punch KO.

 

Wlad ko all day long. Wlad was a very accurate puncher with great distance control. And Wilder has very little defence.

 

Klitschko KO.

Wilder has little defence for a jab, Washington thumped him all over the ring with his average jab. Wlad would absolutely pepper Wilder with his elite jab and mallet him with the right when Wilder tries to get stroppy. Wilder simply doesn't have the technical ability. AJ is far better technically than Wilder and even he was cautious vs Wlad.

 

Wlad would beat him now so it's pretty obvious. Wilder would look like he never saw a jab before and would get blasted with Klitschko 's one , two where that straight right would crumble Wilder inside 6 rounds .

 

If Fury had power he would have stopped Wilder

AJ and Wlad have power, but not the boxing ability of Fury so it evens out

interesting one.

 

Fury is a better boxer then Wlad?
Based on what? Because he outboxed 40 year old Wlad? Prime Wlad would brutally KO 40 year old Fury.

 

Fury will have more fight in him at 40 than Wlad has ever had IN HIS ENTIRE LIFE

When Fury leaves the sport and leaves it to younger man he will support them and show respect. Wlad didn't have the nuts TO THIS DAY to give fury his props. An emotional coward.

 

That's because Fury tested positive for steroids and ducked the rematch.

 

He didn't test positive for steriods or duck the rematch you ignorant fool

He rolled his ankle so had to cancel the rematch, plenty of photo evidence.

He failed a test BORDERLINE test for nandralone a sex steriod that is produced NATURALLY in the body. UKAD sat on that result for nearly ONE YEAR (He failed this test BEFORE he fought and beat WLAD!) and passed 6+ tests prior to fighting Wlad)

UKAD were not going to bring the case to court as they knew they didn't have enough evidence, HOWEVER Fury failing on cocaine and going off on the deep end during 2016 (told testing agency to f off because he wasn't fighting) after beating Wlad forced their hand ALMOST bankrupting them.

 

Lol

 

Facts are undeniable.

Plenty of other dirt you can dig up on the Fury's and drugs/steriods if you want. Just don't bring Tyson into the matter, the man is a saint.

If you want to talk about steriods AJ, Wilder, Haye & the Klitscko's can all enter the conversation line. It's almost a given in all of boxing.

 

I think the most likely scenario would play out something like - Klitschko, after some first half adversity from Wilder, takes Deontay deep and gets the W via a "exhuasted & hopeless" quit on the stool type tko (think W.K. vs Brewster II) in the 10th or so.

 

He was tested positive of nandrolone and banned for two years. It is a fact.