Wilder was not exposed against Fury, here`s why

I find that extremely doubtful u imagining. You don't have to explain yourself to me or what u lack. You already exposed your insecurities through previous post rants. I'll let u go work on your attempts to trolling.

 

That's due to commercial reasons not physical recovery. No reason Wilder couldn't have been in top shape.

 

I read your post and it's apologist BS, you're as bad as Wilder, it's not an excuse but.... then you list a whole load of other excuses.

Are you seriously telling me fighting once ever 3 months is too hard for fragile little Wilder when past champions have fought more frequently than the champions now and did so in the 15 round era?

As for an example of an older fighting more frequently than 2 times per year which I'll admit is usually the norm at the top level now. Wlad in 2012 fought 3 times at the age of 36, also 3 times in 2008 at the age of 32. Vitali too fought 3 times in 2009 at the age of 38. When Chris Eubanks was champion he defended his title 6 times in one year!

And let's not pretend Wilder isn't in his prime. Heavyweights peak later, 34 may not be a prime for most divisions but for heavyweights, Wilder is right now at his peak.

I again say there was nothing wrong with his legs, his legs performed like they always have in fights. His footwork has always been garbage. But now he's lost and he says his legs were effected were expect to believe him? I saw no signs at all that his footwork or legs were weaker than normal, at least not until round 3 when Fury discombobulated him with that overhand right.

 

Prime Muhammad Ali, 1964-1967, defended his title 5 times in 1966.

 

Stop it. Plenty of ATGs have fought several times a year. That excuse doesn't work for wilder or for kovalev or Caleb plant.

 

My "attempts to trolling"? Yeah mate, whatever. Go dribble in a corner or something.