wilfred benitez versus pernell whitaker at 147

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by quintonjacksonfan, Sep 16, 2020.


  1. quintonjacksonfan

    quintonjacksonfan Active Member Full Member

    1,334
    1,112
    Jul 21, 2004
  2. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,562
    May 4, 2017
    Benitez fought Hearns in a better scientific, technically sound fight which was fought at a higher level than any of Whitaker`s fights, Tommy was better than anybody that Pernell fought.
     
    Richard M Murrieta likes this.
  3. SHADAPBLAD

    SHADAPBLAD Viscous Knockouts Full Member

    1,143
    1,279
    Feb 15, 2017
    And lost
     
  4. Xplosive

    Xplosive Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,341
    9,955
    Jun 23, 2008
    Benitez was pretty clearly better at 147 than Pea was IMO.
     
  5. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,562
    May 4, 2017
    He lost to a master boxer with a great reach, Hearns would have destroyed Pernell at welter, he never fought anybody at that level and wouldn`t have been a welter or light middle champ in the early 80`s, it was a tougher era in boxing.
     
    Smoochie and Richard M Murrieta like this.
  6. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,562
    May 4, 2017
    Split decision.
     
    Richard M Murrieta likes this.
  7. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,436
    9,421
    Jul 15, 2008
    If not better bigger ... a very close decision either way ..
     
    Richard M Murrieta likes this.
  8. Mike Cannon

    Mike Cannon Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,153
    7,427
    Apr 29, 2020
    Dont care, wouldnt have wanted to see the fight any way, SP is a big turn off for me.
     
    Smoochie and Richard M Murrieta like this.