Mike Perez could be the best prospect, so it could happen within 10 years. This content is protected With his height no more than 6ft but weighing a good 105kgs of solid muscle he seems to fit your criteria.
Oh you mean someone like this. [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jVtwVXuxETg"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jVtwVXuxETg[/ame] [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BcpPo8HRyKw&feature=related"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BcpPo8HRyKw&feature=related[/ame] [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jwBqvVYFkRg"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jwBqvVYFkRg[/ame]
Uhhhhh..ya, like that dude. Give him a few years, if those 3 fights are indicative of how good he actually is, we may be looking at the first guy that can beat the big guys!
Valuev is 7'0 and Fury around 6'7 and a bit. Tyson faced men just as tall or heavy. Berbick 6'2 J. Smith 6'4 P. Thomas 6'3 T. Tucker 6'5 T. Biggs 6'5 L. Holmes 6'3 1/2 T. Tubbs 6'3 M. Spinks 6'2 F. Bruno 6'3 C. Williams 6'4
Wernt that big? Wlad is a great for me, but i hate the revising of history. Wlad takes 12 rounds to beat Ibragimov 219, Chambers 208, and Haye 212....are you telling me these men are bigger than M. Spinks, Berbick, Tubbs, Tucker, Smith, Bruno, Williams lol lol so funny
At 35,Tony Tucker still had enough to go the distance with the 28 year old Lennox Lewis in 1993. At his peak he was a solid fighter,with great mobility,who could box and take and throw a hard punch. I'd put around the same level as someone like Mercer.
No where near that big Mitch Green 6'5 and 225 lbs and Tucker 6'5 and 221 lbs. Both he win only points