Will AJ get your respect

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by Jamie1966, Dec 12, 2015.


  1. iceferg

    iceferg Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,348
    2,312
    Apr 25, 2008
    I already rate him highly.
     
  2. Dan88

    Dan88 Active Member Full Member

    1,124
    82
    Nov 24, 2015
    I like joshua but this isn't a fight that is gonna make him. It's a stepping stone.
    Surely we all know this?
     
  3. Jacko

    Jacko Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,566
    8,748
    Apr 25, 2008
    I'll be paying for it as overall it is a decent card and i watch all boxing. However, i am not happy that it is on PPV as the card contains no world title fights and of the top end fights on the card, Bellew v Masternek is the only fight most would say is a legit 50/50. AJ v Whyte is two unproven prospects going at it. It could be a life or death struggle or it could be a blow out. That adds an aura of intrigue, but if I'm paying extra for PPV i expect a potential equal matchup between two proven guys at the top level. Many people also view Eubank v Spike as an interesting side show, almost clown like with the usual Eubank shenanigans and Spikes odd antics. But, when they step into the ring most expect Eubank to take care of business and Spike to have only a punchers chance.

    You also have the factor that PPV stops the sport from growing as has been mentioned many times over the years.
     
  4. newobserver

    newobserver Member Full Member

    321
    0
    Aug 14, 2015
    So you think boxing is a BS sport

    Fair enough

    But then why are you coming onto a boxing forum in first place

    Find a sport

    Where the champions are better qualified for you

    I've seen plenty of great fights on smalltown shows way better than on the TV

    But the guys earning a fortune in comparison on TV are what the lower level guys aspire to

    Brutal sport and anybody earning a good living out of it - good luck to them

    If you don't like what you see walk away
     
  5. newobserver

    newobserver Member Full Member

    321
    0
    Aug 14, 2015
    Clearly though channels like BBC or ITV won't put up the money for the fights

    I like the fact you've at least weighed up this PPV and made a choice

    Some slag the PPV up just for the sake of it IMO
     
  6. Jacko

    Jacko Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,566
    8,748
    Apr 25, 2008
    I can see why promoters use Sky as it pays better than the terrestrial channels, but this card shouldn't have been made as it could only make money as a PPV. This card could have been split into two or even three cards with the top three fights being the headliner. Instead Hearn has put three good sub world world title level fights on the same card and to pay everyone it has to be a PPV.

    It is a very good card, but a non PPV card if we look at the traditional model of PPV which is usually headlined by a world title fight between elite fighters.

    This is the problem with promoters, just like politicians, their plans are firmly entrenched in short termism. There is no long term thinking in what is best for the sport and ultimately,them. PPV may bring in more money, but if they invested in better non PPV cards and sometimes took smaller money from terrestrial channels to get to a bigger audience then long term they could earn more money from a bigger audience and the BBCs, ITVs and even Sky (non POV) would pay more for the fights.
     
  7. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,578
    Nov 24, 2005
    This fight should be on channel 5 like Fury-Chisora 1 was.
    This fight isn't deserving of the ridiculous hype and the PPV status.
    Whoever wins deserves credit for the win but it's not exactly a fight to justify the hype that the win will undoubtedly provoke.
    It's a couple of prospects looking to break through, it's not worthy to be considered a top-flight match up.
     
  8. supremo

    supremo Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,765
    14
    Oct 15, 2009
    Wrestling aint a sport.
    I know Sky Sports is PPV- that's the point- I have already paid £80 this month for Sky, when the only reason I have additional channels is incase there is boxing on- I don't think I have watched one premiership game from start to finish this season but I am funding that on a weekly basis then when it is time to watch a show involving MY sport I need to pay again?!??!

    It isn't a great card. but then few PPV cards these days are. PPV used to be for special events like Tyson vs Holyfield, now it seems to be for any old *******s that Eddie Hearn thinks he can sell to us mugs.

    Aye you're right if we don't like it, but we are boxing fans so we compromise our principles as it is better than watching X factor so we are being exploited by Hearn. If we want to watch boxing we don't really have much choice.
     
  9. DoubleEdge

    DoubleEdge The king of Kings banned

    5,654
    3
    Jul 2, 2011
    He doesn't 'think', he knows, because you are a mug
    that you will still buy it.
     
  10. YearZero

    YearZero Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,494
    402
    Sep 10, 2012
    go cry some more. i take the good with the bad. just like everything in life. theres **** movies and then theres good movies but i wont stop watching movies altogether, that would be idiotic. same with boxing.
     
  11. renuk39

    renuk39 New Member Full Member

    94
    7
    Jun 7, 2012
    He'll struggle, to get any respect from some.:deal