Will Andre Ward stay away from LHW to avoid Nathan Cleverly

what the **** is this ass kissing coward talking about :nut

froch is nothing but a limited plodder fighting in the weakest 168 division of all time.

the only good thing about froch is that he will have the bollocks to take on cleverly when the time is right, whilst ward will continue to hide out in oakland infront of his phenominal 3,000 crowds :deal

 

This has brightened my day, I actually think Cleverly is decent but wouldn't beat Ward.

But to stay in tune with this thread.

Nathan Cleverly is an unbeaten light heavyweight champion of the world, he is also a proud graduate from Cardiff University with a 2.2 in Mathematics. Both boxing and mathematics were studied side by side both in theory and practical situations which has resulted in brilliantly calculated precision in the boxing ring, his knowledge in complex statistical probability and exact angles are both tools he regularly uses in the ring to calculate the odds of each punch working to his advantage, his mathematical knowledge and brilliant boxing skill combined together tells us exactly how he would beat Andre Ward step by step to end up with a simple solution.

Reasons why Nathan Cleverly would beat Andre Ward

1. He knows his own compubox stats before they are published.
2. He knows the exact punching stats for Ward, therefore knows Ward's percentage of success with each punch and can therefore work out methods to avoid these punches being thrown.
3. After watching hours of ward footage he can work out the angle Ward is least comfortable fighting at and stay there.

Sorry Ward fans but Nathan Cleverly > Andre Ward is logically proven.

 

This content is protected

This content is protected

 

Is that Quato?

 

Cleverly would wreck ward.

Calzaghe lhw clone would be too big and too strong for glass ward at 175lb

 

does anyone seriously think cleverly would get his ass handed to him by darnell boone nut :rofl:rofl atsch

 

This autistic approach to analysis is stopping your development, bailey.

Doing boxrec-style analysis can only take one so far.

Look at level of performance instead. That is the only thing that is relevant when assessing how good a fighter is.

When was the last time a SMW performed as well in his signature fights (Kessler, Froch, Dawson) given the level of performance of those opponents on the night?

You'd have to go back to Calzaghe...

My view, for what it's worth.

 

Ward is ducking Cleverly. It's irrefutable.

 

In my avatar, yeah.