Will Austin Trout get a fair shake against Canelo in Texas

If he gets robbed, oh well. The fans will know the truth.

 

Hopefully not. He's a boring running *****.

 

Cloud vs campillo, malignaggi vs. Diaz, Carlos Molina vs Kirkland, Lara vs Williams. Those are some of the more recent bad decisions in Texas. It doesn't matter to me, regardless of who wins the decision I always keep my own scorecard. I'll know who wins. Whitaker vs Chavez was in Texas. One of the worst Robberys of all time.

 

Exactly, if trout knocked down Canelo every round and they gave Canelo the decision a lot of Canelo fans would swore he won.

 

How about we talk about Rios-Abril, I remember the night that Abril-Rios happened Kevin Lole wanted to talk about this instead, seems to be a GB hater tactic, my point was robberies don't only happen in Texas, get it?

 

Fine no robberies happen anywhere else but Texas, man all I hear is robbery, sound like Matthysse fans

 

agreed.

this is one of the worst robberies i have ever seen in thirty years of watching the sport.
[url]http://boxrec.com/media/index.php?title=Fight:1764243[/url]

this whole forum will know what trout is up agaisnt once the judges for this fight are announced as guys like me are going to post their respective records and history.

canelo nuthuggers hate me because i have no problem exposing info like this.

****, canelo nuthuggers are the only ones angry and bitter right now when everyone else is happy that canelos finally fighting a live body...after being champion for two ****ing years and making a complete mockery out of the wbc belt.

you would have to be naive to deny that trout, in all likelihood, wont get a fair shake against a gbp fighter in texas as there are plety of examples to back this up.

 

It's hilarious that we still have some people inserting the first Malignaggi-Diaz fight into these's discussions of bad decisions.Outside of two bad scorecards, it was a ridiculously close fight in which Malignaggi probably should have had the edge.In no way comparable to the other fights listed (one of which wasn't even in Texas) or even Malignaggi's recent stinker of a decision against Cano.

 

lol no way hes getting a fair shake.........0 chance

 

agreed.

it was a closer fight than some make it out to be but gbp judge gale van hoyes card is unexplainable as was his scoring for the molina/kirkland fight.

[url]http://boxrec.com/media/index.php?title=Fight:1649223[/url]

and the pauli fight

[url]http://boxrec.com/media/index.php?title=Fight:1412530[/url]

gale van hoye, who in all likelihood will be a judge for the canelo/trout fight, shows a distinctive pattern that trout will probably have to sweep the two remaining cards to get a decision on april 20.

only a cluless canelo nuthugger would think differently.

 

Lets call this **** off I don't want to hear Trout fans crying robbery for the next 3 years

 

Young undefeated fighters. Either man would make for a super fight given the victory.

 

Boxing is the one sport in which the official scorecards often don't matter. The fans keep their own.

That said, Al Haymon isn't just going to let Oscar stack the deck. I'll be shocked if Gale Von Hoye is assigned to this fight.

 

Excuses have begun. Dont worry about it, Trouts going to get raped by canelo

 

I'll put it this way, Canelo has a punchers chance and that's about it. That doesn't mean a one punch chance because I'm not convinced of his so-called devastating knockout ability. I believe Trout will be able to handle his shots unless he gets caught not looking. Anything can happen. The real question is; can Canelo handle repeated hard shots from Trout. I have never seen him do that and he will be tested in that area in this fight. If Canelo can't knock Trout out, then he is gonna lose because he will be quite simply out boxed.:bbb