Why would Bradley be boo'd. While he didn't do enough to win, he put in a good performance, which people don't take note of. Particularly in his ability to make Pacquaio miss. Did Bradley pay off the judges? No. Why would he be boo'd. Have some perspective.
Didn't say he should personally, but there seems to be some real vittoral towards him, see above 'cheater' 'fraud' etc
Of course there is. Mostly casual fans who don't know any better. All Bradley did was go in there and fight his heart out and he's entitled to reap the benefits, as any fighter would. He didn't pay anyone off. Hate towards him personally is illogical and moronic, but entirely unsurprising. Having watched the fight several times, I still see it the same way as I did on the night. A 1/2 round victory for Pacquiao would have been correct, possibly even a draw at a stretch. It was nowhere near a robbery. All this **** about 'worst robbery in boxing history' is laughable. People can't take that it was Pacquiao who was on the end of a bad decision, that's all. And a bad decision is all it was. Didn't hear them all whining when it was JMM losing out, which was an even more one-sided fight in my opinion.
"Pacquiao is scared. i will beat him worse than i did before." :rofl he is a dick for believing that he won. The best thing he could have done is say "Hey, lets do it again." It´s bit like he got dominated and got the gift. He was in the fight but he was outclassed.
I dont think he should be boo'ed. He came to fight and at the end of the day he wasnt the one scoring the cards so how can you really blame him? If anything he wanted the rematch
I has Pac winning very clearly but Pac's inactivity for 2 mins of every round did not impress the judges.
How is it Bradley's fault that Pac didnt get the decision in his last fight? Why don't you blame their promoter, Bob Arum, the one who has been investigated for fixing fights in the past? Or does Arum get a pass because he's white? :think