Will Bradley/Campbell Be Changed To A No Contest?

:verysad Sad that that's how most think on this board.

It wasn't the cut that bothered him it was that he could not see.


Nate's a humble guy. He wouldn't quit like this if he didn't feel he was in serious trouble.

Bleeding behind the eye is a lot different from blood going into the eye from a cut.

 

Cant believe how ignorant some of the people are on this board. You seem to be forgetting that boxing is a brutal sport and if I was in Campbell's position and I could not see out of one of my eyes, do you really think I am going to risk losing sight in one eye just for the fans sadistic entertainment, get the **** out of here.

There is being a warrior and there is being a stupid idiot. I am a warrior but Im not an idiot.

I would rather be able to see my kids at home with 2 eyes than be blinded in one because I chose to box whilst I could not see, thats just dumb and if that so happens to be some cultural atitude to boxing then so be it but you have to draw the line somewhere.

The only thing that worked against campbell is basically the way it got stopped in the corner, I feel that we need to definitely bring video replays into boxing in the same way we have it in American Football aswell as Cricket.

Otherwise these bull**** decisions will keep happening.

 

The dumb ****s will have to read your post about 5 times over before they get it. Campbell clearly stated what the problem was as soon as the round ended, then again in the interview.