Will Calzaghe go down at the best ever brit?

Lewis will probably go down as the best brit. Ricky on here will probably be near the bottom of everybodys list on here because he his the man people love to hate. But Nobody not even bruno when fighting tyson for the first time took 15000 fans across the pond.

 

Eubank was not the same fighter after watson 2, the thompson fight the first one carl underestimated him and in the second he battered him.Don't forget eubank had lost back to back fights agianst collins whilst Kt had took out mitchell in three rounds.

 

I doubt it. 20 WBO defences does not equal greatest ever Brit. Ask yourself if beating Lacy and Kessler is enough to make him the best. It clearly isn't.

 

Eubank had two weeks to prepare for the Calzaghe fight and way past his best.

Tszyu was the man at 140 and P4P top 3 or 5.

Eubank wasn't fully prepared and definitely more shot.


Lacy was hyped by yanks, that doesn't make him good. He's a **** fighter, simple as that.

 

Theres no point arguing wih them lad.

 

I'd love to see the predictions the guys who call Tszyu 'shot' made for the Hatton - Tszyu fight, bet it'd make great reading.

Easy to say he's shot now, bet they never gave Hatton a chance at the time.

 

They weren't pal they said he be exposed and out in abut 6/7 rounds:good .

 

Probably because they thought a "shot" Tszyu would still beat Hatton which would be a valid opinion.

 

Calzaghe is infinitely more talented than Hatton, but Calzaghe's resume isn't anything to write home about and when comparing the two resumes, it's quite close...

 

We are happy that the best fighter on this Island is a welshman...Problem is with the english is that if a Scot or Welshman succeeds he suddenly becomes British but If he fails hes the welsh or scotsman again...........No offence but you can keep that union Jack....:-(

 

Have other British fighters beat better opponents then Lacy or Kessler?

Answer - Yes, many.

What are Calzaghes career highs and defining fights - Answer wins against Lacy and Kessler.

Joe doesn't deserve the up-most recognition IMO, because he never took the risks. He simply never fought the best. Because of that we can only guess how good he could have been and not properly guage how good he actually was.

I'd give him a lower top ten place.

I have more respect for a fighter who faces the best and loses then one who remains unbeaten fighting boxers of a lesser quality.

 

He was born in England! :-(