Agree. He has basically positioned himself so that he "can't be wrong". How can one emphatically say "I will die on this hill, Crawford definitely beats Canelo" and then in the same post say Canelo gets no credit for a win? He literally just said Canelo can't beat him so by definition Canelo beating Crawford is a massive upset. (according to his words not mine) . You can't reason with people like that because they are "always right".