I saw him fight on the undercard of something, can't quite remember what it was. Possibly, Mayweather vs Marquez, and he didnt look that good against a journeyman. Didn't see anything spectacular.
it is assumed that he is with the "correct promoter", many would question Goldenboys promtion of "prospects"...
No ****ing chance, and I've been saying that for many years on here. Where's my due? He stopped improving ages ago.
I hope Craig wins a world title, i'd like to see him in with the best in the UK first. imo Macklin and Barker would be real good fights for Craig, although unlikely to happen.
Supremo, very good comment. Kelly Green, nail your colours to the mast! "...most likely not...."! Dan-B "slow"???????? He beat Vera, Parison, Boone, Andrews in spite of his sluggish style? So how come he`s 18 and 0? You`ll find your due inserted in your rectum, Appo!
Its an unanimous decision Grendal , the stats never lie. The good people on ESB have voted and unlike you did so without bias and have come to the conclusion Mcewan doesnt have the goods.
Kelly, look up "unanimous" in the dictionary. Clue...it is not "a rodent`s grandmother". I refer you to the old adage, "its quality, not quantity".
He certainly has great footwork, thats a definate, probably better than all the british guys at his weight. He has the style to be awkward for all of the british guys trust me on that.
Beating those B and C level fighters means he isn't slow? I don't understand your logic. He's an average plodder.
I don't think so but you can never say never in boxing just because of the way these things can be manufactured. He's not the best prospect coming up at middle by a long shot.
to be fair you can say what you like about craig but flat footed has to be the daftest thing iv heard said about him hes anything flat footed!!! always on his toes