Will Eddie Hearn answer 2 questions to make AJ-Wilder?

Honestly this is turning into Mayweather-Pacquaio and I’m very disinterested in seeing the fight now. All this bitching like a bunch of females and Hearns blatant lies to try to duck the fight, it’s a **** show. I’ll definitley be watching via illegal stream if it does happen. Purely based on the posturing and roadblocking done by both parties. Same goes for GGG vs Canelo. From now we gotta a new rule in my house if the fighters wanna be greedy prima donas who don’t fight the best I respect that decision. Just know I’m gonnna stream all of your events till I feel I got my money’s worth.

 

Hearn doesn’t want this fight.

 

I had to use VPN to read this article. What kind of news site geo-blocks potential traffic? Unless it's Sky censoring the UK on behalf of Eddie? lol

Wonder what these two questions are? Where and when?

 

I think Wilder has finally accepted and is acting like the B-SIDE, thus the fight should be signed fairly soon.

Parker accepted it, now its Wilders turn.

I have no problem with Hearn/AJ turning down the 50 mill and giving Wilders camp so much control over the fight, AJ/Hearn should have the fight where they choose, end of. Any other talk about that is B side talking incorrectly assuming its the A Side.

Thats nothing to do with being a fan of AJ, its what has always happened. Except with young ignorant Wilder fans that need to learn respect before i whoop their damned tails with a riding crop!!!

 

Riding crop i say!!!!!!

 

I knew I shouldn't have done 36mph in a built up area...

 

Deontay accpeted Monday June 11. Eddie sent the contract next Monday

Wilder & Co. asked for clarification on 2 points, 24 hours later, on Tuesday

Eddie on Saturday: Deontay took too long. Don't want it. AJ needs 52 weeks for Wilder​

 

This content is protected

 

intradesting

 

Hearn's conduct is becoming an embarrassment. He even said he was trash talking the Wilder team, like he's the boxer not AJ. So we know who he thinks the A-side is in this deal: It's not Wilder.... it's not AJ... it's 'Fast' Eddie Hearn under the promotional banner of Pride Before A Fall Ltd.

And he didn't really answer the question did he?

 

Yes he did. That answer is clearly saying his responded to the queries from Finkel

 

No it did not. It said he was 'satisfied'... it's deliberately ambiguous and not the same as saying 'we provided answers to the two questions, the ball is in their court now', or something similar. If it was intended to be 'clear' as you say, he wouldn't have replied with the language of a prepubescent boy.

If you can't see the difference between clear business-like speak and vague confirmations which don't address specifics, I can't help you...

 

I took his response as he answered Wilders teams question. Also both teams said that they don’t like negotiating the press but do a lot of twitting about them lol