Will Floyd Mayweather become more well appreciated as time goes on?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by LD Boxer-Puncher, Nov 10, 2017.


  1. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,144
    13,101
    Jan 4, 2008
    But quite a few less title fights, especially in his 30's.

    I definitely agree if you take the size disadvantage in consideration. No shame in losing to those guys, seeing how Duran started at a lower weight. But the losses to Benitez and, especially, Hearns were very one-sided.

    Similar with the Leonard rematch. No shame in losing to a bigger fighter of Ray's calibre, but the way he did it was shameful. And losing to Laing is just plain embarrassing for someone looking at top 10 p4p.

    I believe he would, but that's just speculation.
     
    Last edited: Nov 15, 2017
  2. LD Boxer-Puncher

    LD Boxer-Puncher Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,783
    1,182
    May 10, 2017
    You're not the brightest tool in the box at all. I'll explain again for you.... Again

    He ranks highly in the categories where I said one of, and I did not say he was TBE in those particular aspects or from those viewpoints. I said overall.

    I am making that argument, and no he does not.

    Coming from someone who claims McGregor performed well in his "bout", that's extremely rich. I'm a boxing historian in comparison to yourself.

    He took nothing. Anyone using their eyes could see he was GIVEN the first 4 rounds. The rest you're talking utter drivel which I highly doubt anyone in the world agrees with. It actually confirms how bitter pound are about his career. It clouds your judgement, or perhaps you're one of the ones mentioned in the quote below and it hurts that you were wrong.

    Oh by the way, surely that was to be expected based on your analysis of Floyd's opponents, as Floyd was finished long before that fight and washed up himself, or does that argument only work when it suits the point you want it to make? Like the rest of them.

    Emmm... Yes, my opinion... Against yours? Generally how it works. 42-0 fighter being called green is rather impressive scraping of the barrel from you... Again, just my opinion.

    Point blank lie that you're a fan, you're arguing with someone who isn't and you're absolutely desperate about it.

    No, you didn't, nor did I say you did.
    I did

    Why do you need to see him on a list to accept it?

    Can you not use your own eyes and form your own opinions?
     
  3. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,144
    13,101
    Jan 4, 2008
    Duran was further from his prime when facing Barkley, and Pac was better p4p than Barkley but also a fair bit smaller. But, yeah, you can look at it from several angles.
     
    Last edited: Nov 15, 2017
  4. surfinghb

    surfinghb Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,650
    17,928
    Aug 26, 2017
    C.mon man , you're better than yet .. I have already posted many of my "own opinions"
     
    JohnThomas1 likes this.
  5. PernellSweetPea

    PernellSweetPea Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,116
    5,732
    Feb 26, 2009
    all of these excuses for Floyd. When he fought anyone there were always stipulations and timing to his fights.. To fight guys in off times.. It is very well understood how Floyd handpicked and I don't need talk to tell me Floyd was the one who didn't want the fight. Manny fought anyone at the right times.. Always.. He was not afraid.
     
    bodhi and surfinghb like this.
  6. PernellSweetPea

    PernellSweetPea Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,116
    5,732
    Feb 26, 2009
    I agree Barkley was not a Pacman, and Duran had a great chance to beat him and not beat many others, but Duran gets credit for beating Barkley..
     
  7. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    26,728
    17,773
    Apr 3, 2012
    He didn't fight Mosley, Morales, Margarito, Hatton, and others at the right time. Cotto was stipulated as hell. He tried to cherry pick Marquez and got his lights put out.
     
  8. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,144
    13,101
    Jan 4, 2008
    Absolutely. Fantastic win.
     
  9. LD Boxer-Puncher

    LD Boxer-Puncher Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,783
    1,182
    May 10, 2017
    No doubt... I suppose my point is more, use those opinions all the time and don't take other people's as gospel
     
  10. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    60,771
    81,099
    Aug 21, 2012
    Brightest bulb, sharpest tool. But do carry on. :eaea:

    You do that. :periodico:

    ^Load of garbage. Where you said one of what? What argument are you making? You're not making an argument, you're throwing words together ungrammatically and at random. I hope that your first language isn't English. If it is, perhaps you ought to head back to school.

    Really? A historian? Wow, impressive. Enlighten us how many other DEBUT BOXERS went 10 rounds with an ATG (allegedly) with 49 fights under their belt. I'll wait.

    :risas3::risas3: Floyd got his ass kicked in those rounds and only little girls with a mancrush try to argue otherwise. I guess that PBF LIKES getting punched up, now? :lol:

    In actual fact you're talking complete gibberish and the fact that you're getting all riled up proves that you seek validation for your own worthless existence between a pair of warm Mayweather testes. :asskisserYour faculty of reason has been overwhelmed by the blooming flower of love that you experience whenever you see a video of Floyd. Or a picture. Or an oddly shaped pretzel that reminds you of him.:love3:

    I didn't quite get the gist of that but I'm sure that you were wrong again.

    I'm a huge, huge Floyd fan. In fact, I'm so ornery because I have finally met my match in Floyd worship in the form of yourself. I can't deal with the fact that you'd actually bend like a girl for Floyd whereas I wouldn't. :gaysex:

    But, to recap, even I have to admit that, no, he is NOT "TBE"

    :nonono
     
  11. THE BLADE 2

    THE BLADE 2 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,746
    4,491
    Jul 14, 2009
    Again, who has Canelo beaten? Plus, he got a few gifts here and there. Nobody thought he deserved a draw.Canelo is an HBO product, Barkley was a real fighter.

    Hearns is an ATG P4P, he went on to beat the best light heavyweight in the world.
     
    bodhi likes this.
  12. THE BLADE 2

    THE BLADE 2 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,746
    4,491
    Jul 14, 2009
    Title défenses against whom? It is the quality of opposition that counts, especially nowadays where there is an inflation sanctioning bodies.
     
    bodhi likes this.
  13. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    26,728
    17,773
    Apr 3, 2012
    Barkley would not go 2-0-1 against Trout, Lara, and GGG. Canelo received zero gifts.

    Canelo most likely would lose to a 160 Hearns unless he gassed hard.

    This is boxing. Deal with it.
     
  14. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,144
    13,101
    Jan 4, 2008
    Well, Duran never defended as undisputed champ either. He unified in his rubber against DeJesus, but then vacated and moved up to WW and never unified again.
     
  15. LD Boxer-Puncher

    LD Boxer-Puncher Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,783
    1,182
    May 10, 2017
    You're an absolute fool (or a child), so I'm done with this. I've made myself perfectly clear to anyone using their brain, I'm tired and have been working all day and didn't notice a few autocorrected words, it's still clear what was meant. Your misunderstanding of it isn't my problem.

    It became clear that I'm rising to someone who doesn't really understand what they're talking about when you mentioned McGregor having success, so as I say, I'm done with this. Top tip: just because he says he did... Doesn't mean he did .
    See fighters often bend the truth to suit themselves, much like what you do with your logic.

    Good luck with school