Right both would be entertaining however looking at the present styles and tools the Charlo fight would be more dangerous. I wouldn’t necessarily call it a duck per say because the Murata fight is still legit and it would allot him another shot at Ginger via a more predictable and beatable fighter.
Why is it? Regardless of whether or not Derevyanchenko beats or loses to Jacobs imo he still beats Charlo.
FFS not the race card again......no need to panic I'm only Germanic. In regards to Odin/Woden etc depends on which area you was from when that belief was alive but as you well know it's certainly not the Caribbean.
I'm not but one fighter has signed to face Derevyanchenko and the other still hasn't fought since beating the great Centano.
He hasn't fought because his promoter has not lined up a fight for him. He wants to fight and be more active. Like I said before PBC has done a **** job with him and his twin.
And he needs to be more vocal, he should have pressured the situation regarding Danny, but i agree with PBC.
There's no reason for GGG to fight a young strong fighter at his age. He needs to look for a bigger money match to cash out. No fighter closing in on 37 is going to go through the divisions best, Jacobs, Charlo then get back to Canelo.
That was a huge robbery Murata has the better resume at 160 and is clearly more known in Asia Beating the Heiland's and fighting once every year isn't cutting it either. And why should Murata fight outside of Japan? he is a big star there and makes a lot of money
Jacobs beats derevchenko, what then? I doubt he'd even be offered a fight against Charloo. Like I said, it's a moot point