Will JMM be afraid to fight Pac at 140?

:rofl

pac and cotto are the same size.?:rofl:rofl:rofl what a ****ing idiot. cotto just happens to fight one ****ing weight above pac, true. true. true. and that happened just last may 2. moron. cotto is 5'7. pbf is 5'8. that is an inch, not two.

stupidity is written all over you. "how is Floyd fighting Pac picking on smaller fighter?" pac and jmm are basically same physique, height. everything. if that is the case, then why the hell did they agree to a catchweight with jmm you moron.

if pac=jmm=pbf in terms of size, they would be fighting at 135 or 140. tell me, at what weight is pbf fighting jmm again. :!::!::!:

dig your own grave fool.

 

your just a pac hater, clear to see. this was supposed to be a jmm-pac thread but you just can't keep off the nuts of pbf.

force= mass X acceleration, dumbass. mass, in case you forgot is measured in kilos or pounds.

that is why there are weighclasses moron, precisely to balance the factors like height, weight since these are factors to be considered for the amount of force to be generated.
your bright bulb can't fathom that can you.

by your argument, we can have 6'1 paul williams fighting mike tyson because paul is taller than mike.


dig your own grave. now run along kid. your way out of your league in this case.

 

:rofl:rofl:rofl. ****ing idiot. is same height=same size. cotto, is a true welter, has been there for a long time, he is a naturally bigger person compared to pac.

pac has thicker shoulder? thicker neck, thicker trunk? pbf bone structure allowed him to comfortably fight at 154, pac clearly does not belong to 147.

talking to you makes me dumb really. please spread your nughugging ways somewhere. you know, where it is perfectly acceptable to fight older and smaller men than you. atsch:rofl

 

:rofl:rofl:rofl

oh ****, weight class has nothing to do with height? when have you ever seen a 6'3 fighter fight at 106? knock knock. moron. ****ing idiot. can you imagine a fighter as tall as solis or arce fighting in the heavyweight division. ****ing clown. atschatsch

pac fought and was at his best in 140? let me ask, you how many fights has he had at 140. by your logic, pac should be one of the great lww of all time. simply on the basis of 1 fight? that does it, idiotic beyond repair.

cotto and pac, same height, same size. tell me, didnt cotto vacate his belt since he cannot make weight?:hi:

followed boxing a few years ago, :bbb:bbb:bbb. sorry to burst your bubble pal, but dodie boy penalosa use to train near my house when i was still a kid, and that was 20 years ago. :hi: that is why i became a boxing fan early in life, saw gerry cooney fight, saw leonard beat up lalonde.

you on the other hand, is a pure cherrypicker nuthugger. sorry pal, next time around.

now dig your grave.

 

stop skirting the issue moron. if pbf in terms of size, height and all other things/


pbf=pac=jmm. why is it again that pbf agreed at a catchweight. why not fight at 135 or 140? is pbf afraid of losing his size advantage if he goes down to 135 or 140? :bbb:bbb:bbb.


answer this simple question moron.

 

hmm, where are you danny_rand. you have not answered this question. since you insisted that pac=pbf in terms of size, weight etc.

pbf=pac=jmm. why is it again that pbf agreed at a catchweight. why not fight at 135 or 140? is pbf afraid of losing his size advantage if he goes down to 135 or 140? .




moron. digging your own grave or a shithole you need to crawl into.