LOL. It's not MY math. It's just accurate math. Both are good boxers, but I'm just telling you that Mikey is better.
As a boxing fan I can make f'ing predictions, or what else is there. I predict that Lomo and Arum will duck Garcia, and if they do meet, Garcia will knock Lomo out. If you don't like predictions, then find another sport that lacks competition.
You calling a very active fighter that is fighting top competition on every outing a chicken. That is not based on fact. However you are entitled and have a right to be dellusional and make fantasy predictions not predicated on facts.
First you cheat and try to up Lomo's fights per year, and got caught. Another Povetkin. Lomo got his cherry popped by Salido, and Garcia is definitely no Salido. Talk about delusional. Go back to the Dana White network.
Bottom Line: Loma is a great fighter. and in my opinion p4p #1. No need to diss him to make your boy look good. I am not blinded with prejudice and bias I see mickey is a great fighter period.
Neither are GREAT fighters. They are both GOOD fighters with the potential to show their greatness, but as of yet, neither has proven it. However, 3 DIVISION CHAMPION (soon to be 4 division) UNDEFEATED, 36-0 30KOs (not to be confused with 7-1) Mikey Garcia has achieved much more towards that goal than Lomo. Mikey is closer to P4P #1 than Lomo.
you see good i see GREAT, you say potential I say proven, I say p4p you say contender, you say tomoto I say tomato. LETS CALL THE WHOLE THING OFF.
I know boxing, you don't know squat. When Mikey made his pro debut in the 2nd half of 2006, he fought four fights in 5 months. In 2007, he fought 6 fights, in 2008, 5 fights, in 2009, 4 fights, and in 2010, 6 fights. See when you back a good fighter, there is no need to fudge the numbers. Use someone else's calculator to work out the ratio between Garcia and Lomo's annual fights.