Will Oscar Dela hoya pay off anybody involved in the Kov v Canelo fight?

My reasoning? I didn’t say fishnet is buying one judge at a time.
I said, oddly enough, there has been at least one idiotic card in every fight Canelo lost and/or arguably lost.

 

There’s nothing fishy, you’re just yet another mentally slow Golovkin fan. Don’t worry, Alvarez isn’t the first to jump up two weight divisions to take on a serious risk against a champion. Many legendary fighters have done so in the past, that’s what makes them legendary today. You’re just living Golovkin’s career like it’s the ultimate, a career where a Middleweight stays at Middleweight and devours hopeless bums while begging for a payday on social media.

 

Ahah ahaha. This thread. Pure gold. Course he will. It’s kinda Oscars thing.

https://thegruelingtruth.com/boxing/history-bad-judging-canelo-alvarez/

 

The people who have to resort to insults rather than a good discussion show their insecurities. Shame.

https://thegruelingtruth.com/boxing/history-bad-judging-canelo-alvarez/

 

Yes you are cheap when you have no answers for me you make more accusations against my friend Tony & you nor anyone else have one iota of proof against him
Sad huh ????

 

I don’t need TheGruelingTruth(whatever that site is anyway) to tell me what my eyes already saw and judged. Golovkin, despite all the clearly nonsensical marketing via social media hype, was stiff as a tree in both fights and clearly in the first three rounds. The first fight was draw at best, neither fighters looked good. The rematch, however, Alvarez bullied him and clearly took over. He pretty much stood in his face, frustrated him and got the better out of him in most exchanges. Exchanges which he initiated mostly as Golovkin stood there in comical one-dimensional fashion and got dictated.

It’s really no surprise to see Golovkin stiff as a tree. It eventually caught him to him facing hopeless bums with zero realistic hype and actual global interest surrounding any of his previous fights. Hell, even Mayweather, who already had an amazing record was stiffed out early against Oscar.

You can pretend this is nonsense all you want, you need to start thinking with your head and look at Golovkin’s record properly. 90% of his fights he’s literally going in as a 100/1 favorite.

 

You seem to have misread both the title and thread. Neither of which brought up GGG. Your obsession leads me to believe you are over compensating. Canelo has a history of bought judges. FULL STOP. Oscar manages Canelo. FULL STOP.
These two things are obvious. Now if you want to start a thread where you can talk trash about GGG go ahead. I’m not a GGG fan so I won’t try to stop you. BUT STOP MISDIRECTING the point, which is Oscar de la Hoya clearly bribes people and has bribed people throughout Canelos ENTIRE career.

Oh and by the way, Saying I don’t need to read up on, from multiple different sources, what you’re talking about makes you less knowledgeable on any subject. Read everything you can and your opinion will be better formed and you won’t have to insult people. You could win with facts.

 

So you tend towards the incompetent explanation rather than corruption ?

 

You sound about as knowledgeable on scoring as Adelaide Byrd. She had it 10-2 for Canelo.

 

I lean towards the biased.

 

Another amazing anti-boxing thread on esb

 

That would be the same as corrupt.

 

No, that is like preference.

 

As in prefers to tell lies...

 

I don't know why you ever arrived at such a conclusion.
The thinking behind some of the comments are tortuous and illogical. It seems any and every alt right lunatic fringe theory is blended together.