It should be an automatic rematch if the reigning champ loses especially if it's somewhat close. So you don't want a rematch? lol you people citing the rematch clause i suspect you hate loma more than you love boxing.
if floyd lost like that would you be saying "no rematch" or Canelo? don't think so rematch would have been in the works that night.
If they said no rematch before the fight I'd be fine but 8f it was canelo or Floyd I'd say bring the payday loma don't bring in that much for the opponent
I think he deserves one and i think the community should be calling for one. Also loma took a paycut just to give TEO the opportunity. "Vasyl Lomachenko takes voluntary pay cut to secure next fight against Teofimo Lopez and will earn just £2.7m. VASYL LOMACHENKO has taken a voluntary pay cut to get a fight with Teofimo Lopez" And here we are in boxing getting Fury vs wilder 3 lol
It was a unification fight two had something to lose and loma something to gain that's why he took the paycut
He wants it, fans want it the only people who don't want it are lopez and his fans and people who hate loma.
That's kind of my point by default it should be a rematch if you are a well-known reigning champ a rematch should be automatic especially if you lose in a decision. But leave it to boxing to not let that happen but here we are getting **** like wilder vs fury 3 and no loma rematch
Again loma said no he was to confident thinking he would win can't blame someone for trying to make money after a huge win might be the peak of his career boxing is a business