Will the GOODBOYS bashing Canelo for figjting Khan BASH GGG for Brook fight?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by El Chicano, Jul 8, 2016.


  1. El Chicano

    El Chicano Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,506
    1,821
    Apr 29, 2013
    Cause its the same thing

    They were bashing Canelo bad

    Will they defend this ****ola?
    Smh
     
  2. El Chicano

    El Chicano Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,506
    1,821
    Apr 29, 2013
    You cant defend BS
     
  3. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    60,735
    81,042
    Aug 21, 2012
    Nobody is happy with this.

    Please direct your complaints to Christina Eubank Jr, 01 Yellow Ave, Cowardsville.
     
  4. Reg

    Reg Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,373
    6,926
    Feb 5, 2016
    The real question is will you ignore all the GGG fans who disprove of this and hold on for dear life of that one biased fans comment that says it's a good fight?
     
  5. Willie Maeket

    Willie Maeket "40 Acres and Mule" -General William T. Sherman Full Member

    13,894
    8,368
    Jun 22, 2015
    Fix the title bro. And no this is a slap in the face of all of that **** talk from K2 and any of GGG defenders. Brook has never fought at 160 just like Khan never fought at 155.
    They were probably offered crazy money and that does not make GGG a throwback, that makes him a prostitute .
     
  6. TheVrominator

    TheVrominator Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,804
    7
    Jan 31, 2013
    A turd is a turd. As a Golovkin fan, I have very little interest in this fight. I would rather see him fight actual middleweights.
     
  7. str1

    str1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,106
    263
    May 8, 2006
    I bashed Canelo for fighting Glass Jaw Khan when he had better options. ...like fighting Golovkin like he was supposed to do after Cotto.

    GGG vs Brook is not a bad fight on paper. But the MW king fighting a WW? That's just a Canelo style bi.tch move! Thanks to Eubank jr we get this sh.it!
     
  8. PaddyGarcia

    PaddyGarcia Trivial Annoyance Gold Medalist Full Member

    16,188
    13,231
    Feb 13, 2014
    I will and already have. I get the situation is a little different but it's still trash. I'd sooner him fight Heiland to be honest, anyone that's actually a 160 fighter
     
  9. alexthegreatmc

    alexthegreatmc Sound logic and reason. You're welcome! Full Member

    39,120
    1,801
    Sep 10, 2013
    I wouldn't blame Eubank, Golovkin could've fought another middleweight.
     
  10. str1

    str1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,106
    263
    May 8, 2006
    El Chicano, so do you agree With Canelo vs Khan was a sh.it fight?
     
  11. cippi

    cippi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,155
    888
    Feb 28, 2009
    There both bad but canelo vs khan was worse.

    Khan smaller, khans chin is weaker, khan already lost n been ko'd by prescott n garcia

    Brook at least bigger better chin n undefeated
     
  12. El Chicano

    El Chicano Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,506
    1,821
    Apr 29, 2013
    Yup

    Both are ridiculous
     
  13. Gerushio

    Gerushio Active Member Full Member

    576
    26
    Sep 4, 2008
    Word.
     
  14. The Long Count

    The Long Count Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,428
    8,876
    Oct 8, 2013
    It's not near as bad as Canelo vs Khan. Brook is undefeated and a legit p4p claimant. Also Canelo has more options because he is currently the biggest draw in the sport. Plus he had a fighter who WANTED to fight him in Triple G. Nobody wants to fight Triple G. Hats off to Brook. He really exposed all the middleweights as punks.

    As for the fight it will be a mismatch and if it's PPV I won't buy it. Triple G as good as Brook is still slaughters him too good too big