We all know about the Klits ducking Tye Fields. That's common knowledge, ever since Vitali pretended to retire to avoid him. Please keep this thread for discussion of A-Force. I knew just as soon as Big A dropped that bomb on Sprott that the brothers would be flicking through their big book called "Excuses" once more. Odds on they'll start squealing about "rankings" again. It's a disgrace.
Yes, it's just for fun...which is actually what makes it rather clever. It gives Haye nuthuggers yet another chance to lash out at the Klitschkos. The ironic thing is that we all know its Haye who will eventually fight Audley in a big English showdown. He's as much as said that he would offer him a shot if Audley beat Sprout and some fringe contender like Dimentrenko. Now, Audley is pretty lousy, but he can probably scrape up a fringe contender to beat....Really, all he has to do is call Haye. I'm sure he still has Monte Barrett's number on hand.
Haye must fight Audley...After all, it is the continuation of a theme. So far, he's beat 3 past their prime over 36 year old fighters who were on the slide. He must fight Audley to continue his domination of limited fighters who are nearing retirement.
He has been playing possum his whole career. Waiting for this moment when everyone writes him off, then bang. He KO's everyone.
my thoughts exactly. i knew audley would land that punch, and i said to myself, i know he's playing possum, because we all knew deep down audley is just as good as lewis, if not better. in my opinion, audley is better than ray robinson, but he has to be on his B-game to be as good as that, and we've only seen audley on his Z-game so far. wladimir and vitali right now are deciding how they're going to avoid this steam train they call A-Force. i'm not sure the boxing fans can let the klitschko's avoid such a high calibre of fighter as audley as this the most anticipated fight for the past 100 years. this is the fight the boxing world really want to see.
Sure, real tired. But what statement was inaccurate? Which was untrue? Haye's heavyweight resume is onion paper...it's nothing. He beat three guys who are dying to retire. Three guys who were specifically chosen because they couldn't punch, hadn't had a big win in years and yet still somehow had managed maintain decent reputations. What about that is incorrect?
You guys best hope Audley's not reading this! Something tells me the humour would go right over his head and Harrison will have his drum out thinking he's got the fans back...
We joke, but every Haye fans knows that if it had been a Klitschko who had bested the mighty triumvirate of Barrett--Valuev--Ruiz, you guys would have shrugged it off and said, "So what?" Furthermore, you would have said Barrett was a never was, Valuev was well past it, as evidenced by his horrible showing against Holyfield, and that Ruiz was a shell of his once mediorce self with that glossy 4-3 record over the past 5 years. What about this is incorrect?