Will the media recognise Ricky Hatton as the P4P#1 should he defeat Pac?

agreed

 

Given that Pac started out at 75% of the weight Hatton started out at...it really oughtn't make that much difference to either's p4p ranking.

It's practically like Hatton taking on Steve Cunningham.

 

Yeah that seems a pretty solid list if it all goes in that way.

 

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

 

Take your pink gloves off and link me. I was watching Hattons fights when you was still in your Nappies shithead.

 

well if as roach has said pac will never fight below 140 again, by your reasoning pac will allways be p4p #1 until he retires. no matter if he loses or not.

 

Obviously you cannot spell or think of any other drivel to spout. 4th tme you have said this. Stop muttering and stumbling, and provide links. Your picking things out the sky mate; Hatton WAS NOT offered any fight, and thats fact my friend.

 

Not at all!

6ish i'd say

We haven't even seen Pac take a flush punch above 130lbs still, and Hatton's one of the hardest hitters at JWW. I see it as a 50/50 fight.

 

You can't debate it because you dont follow the sport, your a Hatton fan, not a boxing fan

 

I dont need to provide a source, because guess what unlike yourself I was a boxing fan in 2004, if you were a boxing fan in 2004 you'd know about it, your simply a Noob though. Ahh 2004 a time when Hatton hadn't fought a top10 fighter despite being offered shots at WBO, WBA and IBF champions like Corley, Judah, Mitchell and Harris, all of which he turned down, removing himself from mandatory positions on numerous occasions

If you don't know that you simply don't follow the sport, or the poster boy on your wall you constantly wank off over

 

:good..they march here (onto ESB boards) like the darn rebel robots controlled by Darth Sidious.

 

Wanking off over Hatton taking on patsy's doesn't count as following the sport Noob. Let me reiterate a fact for you, if you don't know it guess what, it makes you a NOOB:

Listen Noob, Ray Hatton is on record saying they turned the fight down 5 times from 2004-2006, follow boxing for more than 5miniutes and you might catch a clue

 

These fools coming onto a boxing forum to be told Hatton isn't the world's 'bestest boxer everest' is equatable to telling children Santa doesn't exist They really shouldn't come to a boxing forum, they should go have a group wank at rickytheshitmanhatton.com instead

 

Out of curiousity which fighter did he turn down? I don't wanna search through all the pages for it! What was the reason given by Ray? (and is there a link)?

Thanks

 

No Calzaghe would be 1st