Will the new improved version of Enzo Macc destroy American Jonathan Banks?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by FLINT ISLAND, Nov 30, 2008.


Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. catasyou

    catasyou Lucian Bute Full Member

    38,466
    21
    Apr 7, 2008
    He moved up to HW anyway
     
  2. Fat Joe

    Fat Joe Let's have it right Full Member

    6,255
    0
    Feb 12, 2008
    Nah, he was just arse kissing the American media because he had been sparring with Flores. Maybe BJ is better than I think, I've only seen him twice and one of those was against Wilson when he was running all night.
     
  3. Strike

    Strike Boxing Addict banned

    3,982
    0
    Sep 14, 2004
    No you are wrong. Haye was and is in another class and it was a **** easy fight to call. Enzo was never going to land first but Haye is faster, read him and reacts quicker.
     
  4. Fat Joe

    Fat Joe Let's have it right Full Member

    6,255
    0
    Feb 12, 2008
    Can't agree with any of that, Haye has stated many times that Macca has fast hands and despite what some say Haye is far from elusive, especially against CW's.
     
  5. MrMagic

    MrMagic Loyal Member Full Member

    39,534
    71
    Oct 28, 2004
    I'd love to see Macc vs. Alexeev.

    Maccarinelli would look like an old drunk welshman again.
     
  6. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,467
    Sep 7, 2008
    I'd say the old version of Enzo beats Banks, who hasn't convinced me yet.

    Still, will be good to see Enzo and Manny going head-to-head. Steward the supposed better tactician out of the two (though he hasn't done anything of late to show he;s still up there) and Enzo Calzaghe, who has had ups-and-downs in the past year as far as his fighters are concerned, but can still get his boys up for a fight.

    Except Gary Lockett, but that's not Enzo's fault.
     
  7. iceman71

    iceman71 WBC SILVER Champion Full Member

    51,687
    23
    Jul 28, 2008
    enzo will get KOd again
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.