Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Oddone, Jun 10, 2021.
I could see Usyk winning ten out of twelve rounds and having the fight declared a draw.
Had Fury honest judges in Wilder I ?
The same Usyk.
USKY is getting stopped, finally the hype will end.
I cant imagine having honest judges in a top class boxing match.
AJ will not need the assist of the judges against Usyk.
AJ is an animal, he will destroy Usyk with a vicious KO. Usyk probably will return to cruiserweight or retire after getting KOed by AJ.
So about 75% of the forum thinks boxing is corrupt.
That says a lot to me.
I must admit, I always find it hilarious watching Americans talk about this kind of thing when they have the most rotten, corrupted, system on earth.
Fix your own corruption.
As for the OP question, I don't know.
Would AJ get a fair crack if he fought Usyk in Kiev?
Do home fighters always have an unfair advantage when it comes to judges, referees etc...?
Did Fury get a fair shot when they called the first Wilder fight a draw?
Did GGG get impartiality when he fought Canelo the first time?
Yes, it says they’re paying attention.
I think it will be too decisive this time, should it go to points. Usyk will win!
It won't matter Joshua finishes him this time around.
Usyk will stop him
Hilarious looking back at old comments like this
Judges were not good. Scoring that fight 115-113 is really bad.
Get a life. Everyone gets it wrong. I underestimated Usyk. He came through