Will Ward vs Kovalev be on par with Louis-schmeling in terms of historical significance?

I can't believe it. His best post ever ^

 

blizz...hes correct

 

People said before WW1 that it could never happen because so many people would die, and leaders wouldn't be so stupid. In fact that has happened before countless wars throughout history. I hope you're right...

Look into the georgia guidestones. The international elite want to drastically reduce the worlds population to being something more manageable and controllable. A nuclear war would be just the ticket.

 

yes..weve all heard how they want to reduce the population to keep it in balance with nature...thats nothing new to people like us....but they arent going to do it by wiping out the US and russia......they do it through subterfuge....cancer causing agents...diseases.....hooking people on dope...etc

wiping out the united states is not good business for the "ruling elite"...this is where they make their money...on dumb shits like us trying to live above our means and compete with the assholes next door....running up debt so our daughter, gf, or wife can have a 2k handbag like one of the kardashian ****s

you cant compare our current times to pre ww1...thats just ridiculous

 

I didn't compare the current situation to before WW1, I simply said it was ridiculous to suggest a massive war couldn't break out because our leaders are too sensible. I hope we can all agreed thats nonsense.

I'm sure they are trying to control and thin out the population with the verious methods you are saying, but if they want the worlds population to be reduced to 1/14 or less of what it is now, that would take a very long time if it would ever happen. In a nuclear war, even involving massive attacks on the USA, everyone wouldn't necessarily die by the end of it. You might just get several big cities wiped out. Many other countries would likely get drawn in. Iran, who are helping Russia and Assad in Syria would get destroyed. Turkey looks like it may back Russia, and obviously 1/6 of the worlds population lives in china, who be on the side of russia too.

The end goal of our ruling elites is to have a world wide rule from Israel, not the USA.

 

im very well aware of the conspiracy which you are drawing from....i didnt say they wanted to rule from the united states....but the united states is beneficial to business

 

OK, so let me debunk your theory very swiftly.

Let's assume that you are right and that forces known or unknown want to thin the world population out.

The absolute worst way would be by nuclear war. There's no guarantee that some of the massively overstocked nuclear missiles won't be spread around other targets "because if we lose everybody loses". The US and Russia between them have so many nukes that many analysts have questioned the point of so many weapons because subsequent hits will merely turn the rubble over.

Add to this the scenario known as "nuclear winter" which was put forward as a very possible scenario by prominent scientists in the 80's. The precis version is that so much smoke and ash would be put into the atmosphere by the collective burning of all the major cities that the sun would be effectively be blotted out for months, quite possibly triggering a new ice age which means that the "winners" have actually inherited hell on earth.

Now, if somebody wanted to seriously cull the world population they have missed their best chance.

Ebola was the perfect opportunity to get a really good pandemic going. Moreover its a scenario where the super-rich could ride it out in safety on private islands, yachts, mountains retreats, what have you. In fact, if I were a super villain planning to cull the population, I'd do it through a similar virus, and make sure that the contagion erupts at several points so that it can't be contained. In fact, the Russians were working on (and the Americans too have no fear) a super version of smallpox years ago, which can be immunised against. What better weapon than something that kills off all the enemy but leaves your own people unscathed?

Worry about the next pandemic, not nuclear war between Russia and the US.

 

Would like to know the odds on Schmelling by stoppage in the first fight. But no way this fight comes close.

 

I doubt it but I do have that feeling also. That's why the prospect of Hillary being the president worries me, we're getting a warhawk president to escalate things further. The thing is though, that there's nothing to gain for either side, only terrible losses, it wouldn't be worth it for Syria so at least that provides some comfort.

I think USA should just back out honestly, just leave that place. Russians are crazier you don't want to start **** with them.

 

there are many here in the US that have harshly criticized our spending on nukes...the updating and whatnot.....because of what you have said....both stocks are beyond the point of redundancy

it becomes a **** swinging show....yes some of the stuff needs to be updated.....but its all a show now....i will not complain though

 

Nukes are bad but at the same time, good. They prevent a war between major powers, that's why we hadn't had one since 45.

 

People who wishes for countries to be de-nuked are fools IMO.

 

i dont think anyone here has cried for the US to do that....but they wonder why so much is still being spent....alot of the stuff needs to be updated which makes sense....but they wonder why so much money is spent on something that is never used....its typical liberal BS....they dont really understand anything

 

Actually nukes are pretty cheap weapons in relation to what they do. They are the P4P king at cost-to-firepower. So I can understand the overspend and definitely understand the need to maintain. Last I heard the computer code running some of those missiles was still on floppies. Clearly, that has to be corrected. Of course the understanding is that they can't be used unless under nuclear attack from another nuclear power. I hope that everybdy that has them has the same understanding.