Willie Pep deserved better...

'**** me sideways' means 'stone me', or in more basic terms, 'could you be any more obvious?' Look back to that thread and you'll see it wasn't just me who thought your comment was pointless and unfunny, much like most of the things you type in jest.

'Sensitive young man', hardly. I'm an even bigger joker than you on this site (and in real life I can take a joke as well as anyone), it's just you. You're a **** :good

Don't expect me to reply to that other long post either (which I read for three seconds).

 

Got that, quite good actually.

 

You fool. atsch

 

... To our main debate.

 

I wasn't trying to be funny. Just sarcastic and dry with my humour. And to say "**** me sideways" means "stone me", or in your basic terms "could you be any more obvious". Maybe in your own little world yes. To reply with the words "**** me side ways" is you being unsavoury with your words and being insulting. However, I have thick skin and can handle you no problem. You on the otherhand are extremely sensitive and fly off the handle easily when I taunt you on points regarding boxing. I don't taunt others as I don't see them as vulnerable as yourself.


In your previous post. You went onto state that I was harassing you on a near daily basis, mis-quoting you, taunting you, insulting you with all kinds of unsavoury words and terms. But prior to that you said "top blokes, decent enough people or total wankers", then following that you said "you are none of these". If I was acccusing someone of making such actions towards me I'd term them "a wanker". So for you to accuse me of what you did, and come to the conclusion I wasn't a wanker..........again, you fool. If roles were reveresed, I'd be calling you a wanker, make no mistake about it. But your one anyway.


Yes, its just me. Correct. You hate, yes hate me disagreeing with your favourite fighters and my taunts like "nuthugger". Your the one who started the trading of insults on this thread, and got personal. Nuff said. I will admit, I certainly was the taunter.

This person shall remain nameless. But I got an IM from someone a couple of months back, a decent and regular poster, who noticed me and you were at loggerheads with each other on a thread. This person seemed to find you a nasty bit business in their previous experiences with you. So I'm not the only one who's had a run in with you.

Young alcholic lad, time for you to spark open another can of beer. Settle the nerves this afternoon.

 

You do type some rubbish.

You even think I'm an alcoholic

It seems you aren't the only jester :good

 

You are a liar. You openly told me you have a drink problem. We spoke about it regularly on MSN, and the other day you told me you only had four cans of beer. Not the norm for you you said.

If I was getting taunted after admitting I was an alcoholic over the PC, I'd probably just say "I'm not really an alcoholic I was joking". Basic cover-up, but effective.

Why the hell would you give me your MSN, yes you asked me to add you on MSN, not the other way around....chat about music and boxing, and suddenly openly admit to me your an alcholic, then your only jesting now?. Your the strange character.

 

I asked you to add me because you didn't believe I was nineteen. That is all.

As I said before, notice it's never me who initiates conversation. You talk to me, I feed you bull****. If you want to believe I'm an alcoholic, I'm an alcoholic :good

 

Who cares what you wanted to add me for you little fool. You asked me to add you to MSN, end of.........

Initiates conversation. You have messaged me maybe twice on MSN to kick off a conversation, but I'll admit I'm a chatty person and messaged you more often than you did with me. Natural for an outgoing chatty type like myself to initiate conversation.

You feed me bull**** alright. Telling me all about how great your band Suede are, and trying to influence me on them. Next you'll being denying your even into Suede ala your drink problem.

Your the strange one. You openly admit you have a drink problem, then only when your exposed on here in front of all do you deny it.

 

Got to show you this again, just to rub it in.

In your previous post. You went onto state that I was harassing you on a near daily basis, mis-quoting you, taunting you, insulting you with all kinds of unsavoury words and terms. But prior to that you said "top blokes, decent enough people or total wankers", then following that you said "you are none of these". If I was acccusing someone of making such actions towards me I'd term them "a wanker". So for you to accuse me of what you did, and come to the conclusion I wasn't a wanker..........again, you fool. If roles were reveresed, I'd be calling you a wanker, make no mistake about it. But your one anyway.

 

Who's all sensitive now?

By the way, your 'I'd call you a wanker' paragraph is just bizarre.

 

Sensitive. Not me. You were the first one on here who showed vulnerablity to being sensitive and getting personal. I'm only picking you apart, you won't see it that way though, for obvious reasons.

My paragraph on "I'd call you a wanker" is bizarre?. Yes because it clearly exposes that you accused me of "taunts, insults, harassing you" then you came to the conclusion that I wasn't a wanker. Doesn't add up.

Stupid fool.

 

Four replies since................

Your becoming comical now. I'm keeping it going, god I certainly am that.

 

I'm the one keeping it going. Notice the difference in effort between our posts :good

I'm wasting your time, Robbi, while I listen to my Suede collection.

 

Thanks UpWithEvil for uploading Pep vs Walton